THIS IS CALLED – SOMETHING

OK OLGA AND OBAMA – BUY LOW SELL HIGH IS ALSO APPLICABLE IN REAL ESTATE WHICH IS ALL TRUMP DID BY THE WAY..

WELL, ACTUALLY AS I SHOWED U THE MATHS – IF ALL TRUMP DID WAS – KEPT HIS DAD’S MONEY IN STOCK MARKET

HE WOULD BE WORTH DOUBLE THAN WHAT HE IS WORTH TODYA, WHICH IS ONLY $3.2 BILLION..

SO, WHAT HAPPENED TO THE TREST $3.2 BILLION U MAY ASK – WELL, IN MBA MEANING WHARTON AND INSEAD LANGUAGE ITS CALLED – TRUMP DESTROYED VALUE

OK NOW BARACK -> THERE ARE TWO GRAPHS – THAT SHOW – TRANSITION – AS IN

BUSH – JOBS – AND THEN OBAMA JOB AND THEN CONTINUATION OF THE – ITS CALLED TRAJECTORY OR IN MATHS – ITS CALLED – MONOTONICALLY INCREASING TREND AND CONTINUOUS FUNCTION CALCULUS – SO THAT WAS NOTHING BUT CONTINUITY

AND THEN THERE IS ANOTHER GRAPH – RECENTLY PUBLISHED THAT SHOWED UNEMPLOYMENT AS MONOTONICALLY DECREASING FUNCTION – FOR BOTH OBAMA AND CONTINUED FOR TRUMP ALSO..

 

 

 

U KNOW TRENDS TAKE TIME –

NOW, WHATS MISSING IS THAT – TRUMP DID SOME TAX ENGINEERING – WELL, WHY DID IT CREATE A DEFICIT OF $700 BILLION –

WASNT THAT SUPPOSED TO BE LIKE DOING THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT HAPPENED?

I MEAN WE WERE TOLD – THAT ME IS BUSINESS MAN.. ME VERY RICH. ME WENTS TO BEST SCHOOLS – ME KNOWS HOW ECONOMY WORKS ETC – ETC

AND THE ARGUMENT IS THE SAME OLD – CALLED LAFFER CURVE – WHEREIN ITS LIKE THIS PARABOLA –

WHERE IN ITS LIKE SIMPLE CALCULUS – YOU HAVE REVENUE WHICH IS A FUNCTION OF TAXES

LIKE HOW

WELL LIKE AS IN – SEE ABOVE – IF YOU HAVE ZERO TAXES – THEN – BY DEFINITION YOUR INCOME GETS MULTIPLIED BY ZERO AND THAT HENCE EQUALS TO ZERO – AND THIS MEANS

YOUR REVENUE – WHICH MEANS – TAX RATE -AND SOME MULTIPLICATION WITH REVENUE EQUALS ZERO – SO U AS IN GOVERNMENT GETS NO MONEY, NO MONEY MEANS NO REVENUE MEANS ZERO REVENUE

AND ?
WELL, AND THAT WAS VERY EASY AND VERY EVERY CLEAR –

NOW THATS NOT THE DEBATE –

SO, NOW ABOUT THE END POINT – THIS IS BEST WAY TO EXPLAIN FOR ME – TO SAY OLGA..

OK OLGA –

ON THE LAST POINT OF THIS – DOES IT SAYS 100 % ? -OK IT DOES –

NOW, WOULDN’T U ASSUME THAT IF TAX RATE IS 100 % – THEN GOVERNMENT REVENUE SHOULD OR WOULD BE THE MAXIMUM POSSIBLE.. ME MEANS

IF U TAKE ZERO PERCENT FROM MY SALARY THEN U GET ZERO

IF U TAKE 50 % FROM MY SALARY – THIS WOULD MEANS SWEEDEN OR NORWAY OR SOMETHING – THEN IF I EARN $100 THEN – U GET $50 AND I GET TO KEEP $50

THAT $50 YOU GET AS GOVERNMENT IS CALLED TAX COLLECTIONS – ITS CALLED IRS – ITS ALSO CALLED – REVENUE –

SO, WOULDNT U SAY OK THAN IF U MAKE $100 – AND GOVENRMENT MEANS UNCLE SAM MEANS OBAMA – TAKES – 100 % OUT OF WHAT I HAVE IN MY WALLET , WOULDNT THE REVENUE OF OBAMA BE $100 ?

I MEANS WHATS 100 % OF X ? ISSNT 100 % OF $X EQAUL TO $X – SO, OF 100 % OF $100 IS EQAUL TO $100 THAN WONT OBAMA’S SALARY OR REVENUE BE $100 ?

OK THEN

SEE AGAIN

ON THE VERTICAL CALELD Y – AXIS – WHAT IS THE VALUE ON THE Y – AXIS CORRESPONDING TO 100 % NUMBER ON THE – X – AXIS ?

IF U READ CAREFULLY – THE VALUE IS ZERO –

DID U SEE
SEE

AGAIN

NOW, WHAT IS THE VALUE ON THE Y- AXIS FOR THE TAX REVENUE – WHEN THE VALUE OR THE POINT { VALUES ARE PRESENETED IN CORORDINATE GEOMOETRY BY POINTS }
%
WHATS THE VALUE AT ZERO % TAX RATE ? – DID U SAY ZERO HERE TOO

SO,

[A] IF TAX RATE IS ZERO – THEN GOVERNMENT DOESNT GET SHIT – AND HENCE REVENUE IS ZERO ..

BUT THIS CURVE SAYS

[B] IF TAX RATE IS 100 % – THEN U WOULD THINK THAT THE REVENUE SHOULD BE – ALL THE MONEY I EARN WHICH SHOULD BE MAXIUMUM – BUT THIS CRUVE SAYS ZERO ?

SO, WHY THIS CURVE – CALED – LAFERY CURVE – DESIGNED BY ARTHUR LAFFER FROM PEPERDINE UNIVERSITY GOT ADOPTED BY REAGAN ?

LIKE WHY?

WELL, LET ME EXPLAIN U MY WAY AND MY WAY IS NOT THE SAME AS HOW OTHERS EXPLAIN.. BUT U GUYS ARE NOT ALL MATHEMATICAL AND

VERY  FEW – HAVE ACCESS TO EMPIRICAL DATA ..WHICH IS COMPLICATED AND POLITICAL

ANYWAY, SO, HOW DO U EXPLAIN THAT WHEN TAX RATE IS ZERO – THE REVENUE IS ZERO -?

WELL HERE IS HOW – >

ZERO MULTIPLIED BY 100 EQUAL TO IS ZERO – NOW THIS WAS SIMPLE

NOW A HARDER QUESTION

HOW WOULD U EXPLAIN THE REVENUE  WHEN TAX RATE IS 100 %

THEN ALSO THE REVENUE IS ZERO ?

BECAUSE?

WELL BECAUSE U WOULD SAY

REVENUE = INCOME MULTIPLIED BY THE TAX RATE .. DONT U SAY THAT ?

SO WHY ISNT REVENUE  = $100 MULTIPLIES BY 100% = $100 NOT BUT ZERO DOLLARS ?

 

WELL, THE PUZZLE CANT BE SOLVED BY SIMPLE LINEAR INTERPOLATION –
AND THE

LOGIC IS?
WELL,

IF I WORK MY ASS OFF AND EARN $100 – AND ALL OF THAT $100 GOES TO THE GOVERNMENT – THEN – WHY THE FUCK SHOULD I WORK ?

BECAUSE???

WELL BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE SLAVERY – SO I WONT WORK AND WHEN I WONT WORK THEN MY INCOME WOULD BE ZERO – AND WHEN MY INCOME IS ZERO

THEN -?

WELL THEN ZERO MULTIPLIED BY ANY TAX RATE – 10 % OR BTW IN RUSSHIA ITS 15 %

– OR 40 % IN CANADA

OR 50 % IN SWEDEN

 

OR ZERO PERCENT IN SAUDI ARABIA – BY THE WAY SAUDI ARABIA HAS NO INCOME TAXES ..

THEN? WELL THEN –  ZERO MULTIPLIED BY ANYTHING IS ZERO

SO ITS CALLED – INCENTIVE TO WORK IS GONE – THEN I WONT WORK

AND WHEN I WONT WORK I WONT HAVE INCOME AND TAXES ARE PAYABLE ONLY WHEN U HAVE INCOME..

DID U PAY ANY TAXES WHEN U WERE LIKE 12 YEARS OLD ? AND HAD ZERO INCOME..

NOW,

THIS MAKES SENSE – THE END POINTS DO MAKE SENSE .. YES..

SO WHY ECONOMISTS ARGUE

?

WELL ALL THEY ARGUE ABOUT IS THE SHAPE OF THE CURVE –

IE.

BETWEEN THE 2 END POINTS OF ZERO % TAX RATE AND 100 % TAX RATE

 

WHEREIN IS IT LIKE THIS

U KNOW IF U MOVE AWAY FROM THE CENTER – IT SAYS REGION OF DECLINING REVENUE – WHAT DOES THAT MEAN PHYSIOLOGICALLY.

WELL PHYSIOLOGICALLY, IF I WORK MY ASS OFF -BUT OBAMA TAKES AWAY – 90 % OF WHAT I EARN THEN I GUESS I MADE $100 AND OBAMA TOOK AWAY $90 – SO, BASICALLY I AM WORKING ONLY FOR $10 ? –

WELL, ITS CALLED INCENTIVE TO WORK HARD DECREASES – ACCORDING TO THE ABOVE SHAPE – MEANING GEOMETRY

NOW, ON THE LEFT HOWEVER – THERE IS IN THE ABOVE SHAPE – OR CURVE – ITS CALLED CURVE IN CALCULUS – IT SAYS – IF TAX IS HIGHER – THEN – REVENUE IS HIGHER – WHICH MAKES MATHEMATICAL SENSE BECAUSE REVENUE IS PROPORTIONAL TO TAX RATE ..

I MEAN IF TAX RATE IS 15 % LIKE RUSSHIA – THEN REVUE OF GOVERNMENT ON EVERY $100 IS $15 –

AND IF TAX RATE IS 40 % LIKE CANADA THEN REVENUE OF GOVENEMNT = 40 % OF $100 WHICH EQUALS TO $40

 

AND $40 IS MORE THAN $15

BUT

BUT IF THE TAX RATE IS VERY HIGH – LIKE SWEEDEN – OR MAYBE IN SOME NATION WHERE SAYS ITS 90 % THEN – ACTUALLY PEOPLE STOP WORKING MORE – BECAUSE THEY FEAR THAT THE MONEY THEY EARN ISN’T FOR THEMSELVES TO KEEP BUT FOR GOVERNMENT TO CONFISCATE

 

 

 

 

SO.. ITS HARD – THIS SHAPE – REQUIRES A BALANCE – WHATS BALANCE ? – AND WHY BALANCE ?

WELL, IT SEEMS U CANT ARRIVE AT THE QUESTION – OR ANSWER – UNLESS U ASK A FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION WHICH IS

WHY THE FUCK SHOULD GOVERNMENT TAX US ?

AFTER THAT ONLY U CAN ASK THE QUESTION OK SO HOW MUCH IS THE RIGHT AMOUNT OF TAX RATE

NOW, ONE ANSWER I CAN GIVE U WHICH IS WHY THE FUCK IS TAX RATE – NOT ZERO –

AND THE ANSWER IS THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT CITIZENS WANT SOMEONE TO DO WHICH NO ONE PERSON CAN ON HIS OWN

AND THAT EXAMPLES ARE

FOR EXAMPLE ARMY –

POLICE

ROADS

BRIDGES

AND THESE THINGS COST – SO, MOST PEOPLE IN MOST NATIONS AGREE THAT OK – WE NEED POLICE AND ARMY AND ROADS – AND U KNOW KANANAUGH HAS TO BE PAID SALARY AND OBAMA HAS TO BE PAID SALARY – WHERE DOES THAT SALARY COME FROM
/

WELL SALARY FOR OBAMA AND JUDGE KAVANAUGH AND BRIDGES AND ROADS AND STUFF LIKE ARMY TO BOMB IN AFGHAN OR SYRIA OR IRAQ COMES FROM TAXES –

TAXES ON INCOME – INCOME THAT IS EARNED BY CITIZENS AND YEAH ALIENS ALIENS LIKE U

SO, NOW, THE QUESTION IS ?

WELL, OK BUT WHAT IF GOVERNMENT TAKES MONEY FROM US AND THEN PAYS ITSELF HGHE SALARIES AND SPENDS MONEY ON OUR EXPENSE,

WLEL, THAT IS WHAT IS CALLED BIG GOVERNMENT – WHICH IS WHAT GOP SAYS – AND SPENDING MEANS SPENDING BY GOVERNMENTON PROGRAMS LIKE – ARMY, POLICE, RODS ETC ETC ETC AND SO ON..

SO, DEMOCRATS N GENERAL – NORMALLY LIKE HIGHER TAXES – THAN GOP .. DOES.. DO U NOW UNDERSTAND THE SOURCE OF THE CONFLICT.

NOW, WHATS AN OPTIMAL BALANCED RATE – IS VERY HARD – BECAUSE – FOR THAT U HAVE TO REDAS SUPPLY SIDE VERSUS DEMAND SIDE – ECONOMICS

AND THIS IS THE PREREQUISITE FOR LIKE BEGIN THE UNDERSTANDING OF  THE – PHRASES MENTIONED BELOW

 

[A]

ELIZABETH WARREN AND PAUL KRUGMAN WANT THE MOST HIGHEST TAX RATE

[B]

OBAMA WANTS HIGH TAX RATE

[C]

BILL CLINTON SAID – “ WELL, THE ERA OF BIG GOVERNMENT IS OVER “

– BTW GOVERNMENT BECOMES BIG OR SMALL BASED  ON BIG OR SMALL REVENUE COLLECTED FROM WE THE PEOPLE –  WHICH IS A FUNCTION OF INCOME AND TAX RATE ..

 

[D]

REAGAN SAID ” THE BIGGEST JOKE IS – IM FROM THE GOVERNMENT AND IM HERE TO HELP U ” – THIS MEANS – LOW TAX RATE AND MAKE GOVERNMENT SMALLER – NOT BIG

U MAY THINK – OR SAY – AJAY IS THAT SIMPLE SHIT U TOOK A WHOLE BLOG POST TO EXPLAIN? –

WELL, HONEY, IF ONLY OBAMA AND CLINTON AND OTHERS – COULD EXPLAIN THIS TO AMERICANS –

AND PUTIN CAN TO RUSSHIANS

AND BIBI NETANYAHU CAN TO ISARELIS

AND MODI DOESNT NEED TO TO INDIANS

THEN – THE WORLD – WOULD BE A BIT BETTER PLACE AND CITIZENS WHO VOTE BASED ON BUMPER STICKER SHIT SLOGANS – WOULD BE BETTER INFORMED

AND

THEN WE CAN DISCUSS OR DEBATE – AND THEN DECIDE

WHATS THE FUCKING OPTIONAL AND/OR OPTIMAL TAX RATE WAS – IS – WILL AND SHOULD BE –

 

AND THEN FOR U AND OBAMA -> I CAN YES. FUCKING EXPLAIN WHY PAUL KRUGMAN WILL NEVER EVER EVER STOP CITING SWEEDEN AND FRANCE –

AND THE GOP WILL NEVER STOP STOP QUOTING SHUMPETER – AND SOLOW AND ENTREPRENEUR

 

AND ?

AND BILL CLINTON – WILL LAUGH AND LISTEN TO ME – NOT TO OBAMA OR KRUGMAN

AND ? WELL AND THEN I WILL EXPLAIN – WHY I WROTE THIS POST – TITLE – AMERICA THE LAND OF OPPORTUNITY AND FOR WHO? AND ?

AND THEN I CAN EXPLAIN – WHAY BUSINESSES WANT H 1 B – AND WHY SWEDEN IS GOOD FOR MSSES BUT NOT FOR HIGH ACHIEVERS OR HIGH DREAMERS OR FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO DO WHATS DONE IN BANGALORE AND SILICON VALLEY AND I CAN PREDICT THAT THE MOMENT PAUL KRUGMAN OR OBAMA -? – U ALSO – HEAR – ENTREPRENEUR – THE MOMENT – DATAAND SATTSISTICS WOULD BE USED TO SAY – HERE S HOW HAPPY CANADA IS AND THERE IS HOW GREAT SWEDEN IS – AND SO ON..

THE TRUTH IS – BARACK – THAT THERE ARE TWO KINDS OF OPPORTUNITIES – BECAUSE THERE ARE TWO KINDS OF DREAMERS

OPPORTUNITY TO EXIST  -> FOR THIS SEGMENT

PAUL KRUGMAN

IS MORE THAN 100 % RIGHT

AND

OPPORTUNITY TO EXCEL  -> THIS MEANS -> WORK MY ASS OFF – AND HIRE THE BEST I CAN – AND DAMN THE MOTHERFUCKING TORPEDOS IS OUR SWAN SONG

AND NO EXCUSES NO NEED FOR UNIONS AND SHIT – I – AND – WE – WILL BEAT THE WHO’S WHO – NOW, YES THIS IS HOW – AND THIS IS WHY – SILICON VALLEY WILL REMAIN – THE GO TO PLACE –

AND CHINA WILL MEANS WILL BEAT MANY PEOPLE – AND FRANCE AND SWEEDEN WILL MEANS WILLL -BE A PLACE FOR LEISURE AND LOVE

  AS KRUGMAN EXPLAINED -> HELLO ->I LIKE U AND ALSO OBAMA -> BUT TRY – JUST TRY – JUST TRY TO UNDERSTAND US

– PEOPLE LIKE ME- PAUL -> LEISURE – VERSUS – LABOR : TRADE OFF

 

OK OLGA -> THAT ON THE RIGHT -> MEANS 2.1% – THAT’S YOUR AVERAGE IIT , TECHNION – MIT – HARVARD,  WHARTON, STANFORD, INSEAD TRIBE

 

 

AND THAT 0.1 % – IS THE ENTREPRENEUR TRIBE – AND THAT – WILL NOT –

NOT MAY NOT –

BUT WILL NOT

HAPPEN FROM OR IN SWEEDEN –

BUT – WILL MEANS WILL –

HAPPEN FROM AND IN –

YOU FUCKING ESSAY

– AKA SILICON VALLEY –

AUSTIN,

BOSTON,

BANGALORE –

AND CHINA –

AND YEAH ISRAEL –

AND MAYBE SOME FRENCH –

AND STUFF.. 

NOW THIS 0.1 % –

DOESN’T LIKE NECESSARILY OBAMA AND KRUGMAN POLICIES OR PRESCRIPTIONS

FOR THEMSELVES,

BUT THEY AND WE –

AND

MEANS I

– YES INCLUDED –

DO CARE ABOUT

THE NON- 2.1 %

AND

THE NON .1%

 

THIS IS CALLED – 80 % OF THE IIT – TRIBE VOTES DEMOCRATS – AND SAME FOR – SILICON VALLEY – 

 

AND YEAH MANY NOBLE PRIZE WINNERS ALSO WILL SHUT UP IF ONLY THIS ECONOMICS SHIT WAS ? NOT A DISMAL SCIENCE AND HAD SOME LAWS – THERE IS NO LAW – LIKE IN PHYSICS THAT CAN TELL U THE PRECISE MATHEMATICAL GEOMETRY AND RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN REVENUE AND THE RATE –

AND IF THAT WAS KNOWN – THEN – IT WOULD SOLVE MANY A DEBATES

NOW,, IF U ASK OK BUT WHAT DOES KRUGMAN AND WHATS HIS NAME LARRY KUDLOW AND OTHERS LIKE MANKIW ARGUE ABOUT?

WELL, THEY DO THE FOLLOWING

[A] THEY LOOK AT EMPIRICAL STUFF LIKE – WHEN TAX RATE WAS 30 % UNDER REAGAN THEN – THE ECONOMY GREW BY THIS RATE – AND INFLATION BY THIS MUCH – AND THEN THEY HYPOTHESIZE THAT ITS CALLED THAT AND THE RATE – SHOULD BE THIS MUCH

AND

[B] WELL.. IN ERA OF BILL CLINTON WE HAD – NO DEFICITS { DEFICIT IS A BIG WORD FOR AN ARITHMETIC THAT SAYS – SPENDING MINUS REVENUE  EQUAL TO ? –

SO IF SPENDING IS LESS THAN REVENUE THEN ITS BALANCED BUDGET MEANING – ?

WELL, IF U EARN $100 AND U SPEND $50 THEN U HAVE WHAT ? WELL SURPLUS OF $50 YES?

OK SO WE GET WORDS THROWN LIKE

BALANCED BUDGET – ROMNEY WILL BALANCE THE BUDGET BECAUSE HE IS TURN AROUND GUY HE KNOWS HOW TO BALANCE THE BALANCE SHEET BECAUSE HE KNOWS BUSINESS AND OBAMA NOT KNOWS

AND

?

WELL AND SURPLUS LIKE – MY HUSBAND – WHEN HE LEFT OFFICE THEN WE HAD S SURPLUS – THIS MEANS HILLARY CLINTON AND BILL CLINTON

AND ?

WELL,

OK NOW,

?

OK NOW TRUMP -> THE BUSINESS MAN -> WHO KNEW HOW ECONOMY WORKS AND WAS A SUCCESSFUL ONE HAD CREATED A $700 BILLION DEFICIT AND WHATS DEFICIT ?

WELL DEFICIT MEANS U SPEND MORE THAN U EARN

NOW U WILL HEARD BIG SWORDS LIKE

THIS TAX CUT WILL PAY FOR ITSELF ?

SINCE U R ISRAELI- THEN WHEN IRAQ WAS ATTACKED WE HAD THE SAME QUESTION AND THE ANSWER GIVEN WAS – THE COST OF WAR WILL PAY FOR ITSELF BECAUSE WE WILL HAVE OIL

 

NOW, CAN U GUESS WHATS THE ARGUMENT MADE FOR TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH ?

HERE ->> WHEN RICH PEOPLE WILL GET TO KEEP MORE MONEY – THEN THEY WILL INVEST MORE MONEY IN ECONOMY – BY DOING THE FOLLOWING

 

[A] THE RICH WILL BUY MORE PRADA BAGS AND LOUIS VUITTON AND GO ON VACATIONS AND EAT OUT MORE AND BUY MORE CARS AND GADGETS – > IN ABSTRACT WORDS ITS CALLED – DISPOSABLE INCOME WILL GO UP AND WHEN INCOME INCREASES CONSUMPTION INCREASES – AND SO ON

[B] RICH PEOPLE OWN BUSINESSES – THEY WILL SPEND MORE MONEY – IN NEW CAPITAL LIKE NEW FACTORIES MORE MONEY TO BUILD FACTORY MORE MONEY TO HIRE PEOPLE, MORE MONEY TO HIRE DESIGNERS AND WELDERS AND SO ON

[C] ONE MORE THING WHICH I CANT EXPLAIN RIGHT NOW

NOW, A B C IS A THEME- A PHILOSOPHY – ITS CALLED TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS – WHERE

– IF U DONT TAX PEOPLE TOO MUCH, RICH WILL HAVE MORE MONEY AND FROM THEIR WALLETS MONEY WILL TRICKLE  DOWN TO UPPER MIDDLE CLASS

THEN TO MIDDLE CLASS

AND THEN FINALLY MIDDLE CLASS WILL START BUYING AT WALL MART

AND WALL MART EMPLOYEES BY THE WAY ARE POOR – NOT MIDDLE CLASS …

 

 

OK.. SO, UNFORTUNATELY – HERE IS THE EMPIRICAL DATA

– AND PLEASE THIS IS FOR OLGA

AND PEOPLE WHO ARENT SO SMART

LIKE U PEOPLES FROM EITHER CAMPS ARE

– OK PLEASE.. 

[1]

TRICKLE DOWN DOESNT WORK –

AND I DONT HAVE A THEORY ON THIS

BUT I HAVE SOME DISCUSSIONS –

I THINK MY LOGIC IS –

WELL A BILLIONAIRE IS SO RICH

– THAT GIVING HIM A TAX CUT –

IMPLIES GIVING HIM MORE DISPOSABLE MONEY – – DOESN’T TANTAMOUNT TO THE BILLIONAIRE INCREASING CONSUMPTION

– READ A B C ABOVE – AND I THINK – I DONT KNOW BUT I THINK –

ITS BECAUSE WHEN U ARE THAT RICH

– THAT HAVING $2 MILLION MORE

– DOESNT REALLY INCENTIVIZE YOU TO BUY MORE –

BECAUSE – U ALREADY HAVE BOUGHT ALL U CAN AND MORE .

SO NO INCREMENTAL INCOME –

OK TECHNICALLY ITS GOT A NAME,

BUT WHEN WAS LAST TIME U HAD AN ELECTORATE WHO KNEW AND THEN VOTED

– NOW THIS IS EVIDENCED BY EMPRERCIAL DATA –

YES AND THIS LINE THE LIBERALS WILL LOVE AND

SPECIALLY

KRUGMAN WILL FORGIVE .. ME NOW

BUT

[B]

 GOVERNMENT – DOES HAVE WASTE. THIS ARGUMENT OBAMA HATES OR DISLIKES OR AT LEAST DENSEST LIKE –

BUT I HAVE SEEN  MEANING I DID GOVERNMENT CONSULTING

AND

I DIDNT YES EVEN IN USA SHIT –

GOVERNMENT IS MEANS IS BADLY RUN..

ME MEANS THE KIND OF EFFICIENCY

AND OR RESPONSIVENESS

WE SEE IN PRIVATE SECTOR

-SHOULD SHAME THE FUCK OUT OF GOVERNMENT

BUT THEY ARE NEVER ASHAMED –

AND THATS CALLED PERMANENT JOB GUARANTEE –

NO UNION REQUIRED –

U ARE THE GOVERNMENT..

. NOW THIS STATEMENT PAUL KRUGMAN WILL HATE

AND IF U CHALLENGE HIM

THEN HE WOULD GET DOWN WITH OBAMA

AND FIND ALL KINDS OF DATA

AND START ATTACKING AMAZON,

FACE BOOK AND APPLE AND GOOGLE

AND THEN THERE WOULD BE FUZZY MATHS AND SPILLL OVER EFFECTS –

AND ALL THAT ..

BUT I AM NOT BIASED – IN MY BIASED MIND –

I HAVE SEEN USA GOVERNMENT

AND I WORKED IN GOVERNMENT CONSULTING IN USA

AND I HAVE SEEN INDIAN GOVERNMENT –

AND I HAVE SEEN PRIVATE SECTOR

IN BOTH INDIA AND IN FRANCE

AND IN USA

AND FRENCH GOVERNMENT DOENST EVEN PRETEND TO CLAIM CUSTOMER SERVICE IS IN THEIR MANIFESTO ..

BUT HAVE KURGMAN SAY ANYTHING BAD ABOUT FRANCE ?

– WHY? –

ONE WORD – FRANCE AND SWEEDEN

HAVE HIGH TAX RATE –

AND THEY ARE USED AS PROXIES TO JUSTIFY THE BIG GOVERNMENT LIBERALS WANT IN USA..

– THATS WHY MEANS THATS BECAUSE – FRANCE AND SWEEDEN ARE FOUND IN DISCUSSIONS IN AMERCIAN DOMESTIC POLICY –

AND THE HERO OF THEM ALL IS ELIZABETH WARREN AND BERNIE SANDERS –

 

NOW, PAUL IS A NOBLE MAN – BUT OTHER THAN PAUL, I DONT LIKE ANY OF THESE LEFT OF LEFT PEOPLE..

 

AND WHILE ON PAPER SOCIALISM SOUNDS GOOD..

IT SOMEHOW.. ISNT GOOD –

AT LEAST FOR PEOPLE LIKE ME –

WHO ARE BORN IN INDIA HAVE TASTED SOCIALISM AND GOVERNMENT CONTROL OF ECONOMY FOR 2 PLUS DECADES

AND SEEN AND LIVED –

NOT DEBATED AND ANALYSED

BUT SEEN AND LIVED MEANS SHIT

– U KNOW TO LOOK AT PAPER AND SEE DATA ABOUT FRANCE ISNT SAME AS LIVING IN FRANCE.. AND I LIKE FRANCE

– I LIKE INDIA TOO-

I LIKE USA TOO-

I EVEN LIKE RUSSHIA –

AND I LIKE ISRAEL ALSO

AND I LIKE BIBI NETANYAHU – WHO LIKES LOW GOVERNMENT

AND I LIKE OBAMA WHO WANTS MORE GOVERNMENT

AND

I HOWEVER LIKE BILL CLINTON THE BEST ON THIS

– WHO SAID –

JUST THE RIGHT AMOUNT OF GOVERNMENT

 

OK BUBBA U THERE -? – OK HERE IS MY THEORY

CALCULUS NUMBER 1 -> THERE ARE 2 KINDS OF OPPORTUNITIES –

OPPORTUNITIES TO EXIST – AND – SECOND – OPPORTUNITIES TO EXCEL.

ALGEBRA NUMBER 2 ->  WHAT KRUGMAN AND OBAMA PRESCRIBE IS FOR – OPPRTUNITY TO EXIST -IN THEIR SOCIALISM STYLE PROGRAMS

TRIGONOMETRY NUMBER 3 -> BUBBA -> EXPLAIN ME THIS -> INDIANS IN INDIA ARENT SUCCESFUL, BUT THEY IN USA ARE .. PAKSITANIS IN PAKISTAN ARENT SUCCESFUL BUT THEY IN USA ARE .. JEWS IN ISAREL ARENT THAT SUCCESFUL BUT THEY IN USA ARE – CHINESE IN CHINA – EXCEPT BUT A FEW ARENT THAT SUCCESFUL, BUT THEY IN USA ARE – SAME FOR RUSSHAINS IN RUSSHIA –

WHY BUBBA ?

HERE IS MY THEORY BUBBA -> -> SOCIALISM DOESNT CREATE AN AMBIANACE WHERE THERE IS OPPORTUNITY TO EXCEL – EUROPE – IS SOCIALIST, SWEEDEN AND SHIT – AND NORWAY AND WHATEVER BUBBA – ARE GOOD FOR LIVING , YES, MANY GOOD THINGS ARE THERE IN EUROPE.. HOW LONG DID KRUGMAN AND OBAMA AND SANDRE AND WARREN LIVE IN EUROPE ? – THEY DONT HAVE THAT KIND OF ECOSYSTEM – SILICON VALEY DOES.. IN PARTICULAR AND USA IN GENERAL.. YES I KNOW SILICON VALLEY AND BOSTON AND AUSTIN ARENT USA –

BUT BUBBA IT TOOK ONE BANGALORE TO CREATE A WORD WHICH BECAME A VERB – BANGALORED

BUBBA

 

AND

AND WELL MODI IS SAYING MINIMUM GOVERNMENT MAXIMUM GOVERNANCE, I LIKE MINIMUM GOVERNMENT.

SO, WHO LIKES MODI THE MOST IN USA ?- THE ANSWER IS NOT TRUMP BUT NEW GINGRICH .. WHY? – WELL, ASK OBAMA WHY

OK.. NOW, OLKS.. I HAVE TO WRITE FOR OLGA ALSO.. AND BTW IF U WANT MY ADVSIE – THIS IS FOR THE INDEPENDENTS – U KNW THOSE WHO ARE LIKE

I MY HEART I LIKE DEMOCRATS – BUT FROM MY VALLET I LIKE REPUBLICANS .

OK OLGA – DO U – SOMEWHAT UNDERSTAND – WHAT – IS LEFT – AND RIGHT WING – NOT IN SOCIAL BUT IN ECONOMICS ?

OK I WILL EDIT AND ADD MORE

ᐧ