OLGA SHULMAN LEDNICHENKO SANJAY DUTT AND BILL CLINTON ON INDO RUSSIAN ISRAELI FILM IN AFRICAN NATION

OLGA LENDICHENKO SANJAY DUTT BILL CLINTON AN INDO RUSSIAN ISARELI FILM IN AFRICAN NATIONS

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=OLGA+SHULMAN+LEDNICHENKO+SANJAY+DUTT+AND+BILL+CLINTON+ON+INDO+RUSSIAN+ISRAELI+FILM+IN+AFRICAN+NATION&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjO9NCh-vDlAhVgwTgGHRy1D2sQ_AUoAnoECAYQBA&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25

FROM OLGA SHULMAN LEDNCHENKO TO SANJAY DUTT IN LESS THAN 4 YEARS KATRINA KAIF WILL BE LIKE USED CONDOM WITH WRINKLES AND KHANS TOO OLD TO BE WITH PORN STARS

AND ?

WELL AND NO BIOPIC FOR ANY KHANS

BECAUSE THEIR LIFE ISNT, – DIDNT BDSHAH KHAN SAY U IS CONTROVERSIAL’

BTW, IF SOMEONE WERE TO MAKE A BIIOPIC OF SALMAN KAHN, WHAT WOULD THAT BE LIKE

LET ME GUESS

[1] SHIRTLESS GYMN GOER

[2] LOOK ALIKE WANNA BE SANJAY DUTT SOMETIEMS, SOMETIMES WANNA BE STALONNE –

[3] TROUGHT HIS LIFE CREATED LOOK ALIKE OF AISHWARYA RAI AND ME AND SO ON

[4] KILELD POOR CHEAP INDIAN CLASS AND PROTECTED SPEICIES OF AN ANIMAL CLASS – AND ? AND KAIDI NUMBER 106 AND WHAT ELSE? T SHIRT SELLER AND DAWODO IBRAHIM AND WHAT?

SANJAY SEE BELOW, WIGH BETETR WORDS IN GOOGLE, WE HAVE A BLOCK BUSTER IF U WANTS

https://www.google.com/search?pws=0&gl=us&biw=1536&bih=754&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=fhHRXemDINqO4-EPv9qL2AU&q=OLGA+LEDNICHENKO+SANJAY+DUTT+A+2+TONE+BIO+PIC+&oq=OLGA+LEDNICHENKO+SANJAY+DUTT+A+2+TONE+BIO+PIC+&gs_l=img.3…216320.229121..229664…1.0..0.232.6969.0j44j3……0….1..gws-wiz-img…….0i67j0j0i8i30j0i24j0i10i24.jOubFMoZbhk&ved=0ahUKEwjpusOJ9vDlAhVaxzgGHT_tAlsQ4dUDCAc&uact=5#imgrc=_

Someone just viewed: HELLO SUNDAR PICHAI, HAPY NEW YEAR TO EVEN SANAJY DUTT -> THI YEAR IS GOOD – KHAN MOVI E – WOW WELL I GUESS INDIA WONT PROGRESS BECASUE BAARCK HUSIEN DELCARED – THAT INDIA WILL PROGRESS IF THEY WACTH SHAHRUK H KHAN MOVIE, NOW IF BHARAT DOES THE CAHRM THEN IT WOULD BE CAKELD EHATW Page semi-protected Zero (2018 film) From Wikip edia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search Zero Zero official poster.jpg Theatrical release poster Dir ected by Aanand L. Rai Produced by Gauri Khan Written by Himanshu Sharma Screenplay by Himanshu Sharma Starring Shah Ruk h Khan Anushka Sharma Katrina Kaif Music by Original and background music: Ajay−Atul Guest composer: Tanishk Bagchi1 Cinematography Manu Anand Edited by Hemal Kothari Production company Red Chillies E ntertainment Colour Yellow Producti ons2 Distributed by Various Yash Raj Filmsa Release date 21 December 20184 Running time 164 minutes5 Country Ind ia Language Hindi Budget ₹200 crore6 Bo

HELLO QUINCY ,

HOW IS U MY FRIEND

KAK DIL MOI DRUG ?

[youtube http://youtube.com/w/?v=m4yVlPqeZwo]

OH HAPPY NEW YEAR REGRADS OLGA AND AJAY

OH 2007

OH HAPPY NEW YEAR REGRADS OLGA AND AJAY

.

.

.
https://www.google.com/search?q=HELLO+SUNDAR+PICHAI,+HAPY+NEW+YEAR+TO+EVEN+SANAJY+DUTT+-%3E+THI+YEAR+IS+GOOD+-+KHAN+MOVIE+-+WOW+WELL+I+GUESS+INDIA+WONT+PROGRESS+BECASUE+BAARCK+HUSIEN+DELCARED+-+THAT+INDIA+WILL+PROGRESS+IF+THEY+WACTH+SHAHRUKH+KHAN+MOVIE,+NOW+IF+BHARAT+DOES+THE+CAHRM+THEN+IT+WOULD+BE+CAKELD+EHATW+Page+semi-protected+Zero+(2018+film)+From+Wikipedia,+the+free+encyclopedia+Jump+to+navigationJump+to+search+Zero+Zero+official+poster.jpg+Theatrical+release+poster+Directed+by+Aanand+L.+Rai+Produced+by+Gauri+Khan+Written+by+Himanshu+Sharma+Screenplay+by+Himanshu+Sharma+Starring+Shah+Rukh+Khan+Anushka+Sharma+Katrina+Kaif+Music+by+Original+and+background+music:+Ajay%E2%88%92Atul+Guest+composer:+Tanishk+Bagchi%5B1%5D+Cinematography+Manu+Anand+Edited+by+Hemal+Kothari+Production+company+Red+Chillies+Entertainment+Colour+Yellow+Productions%5B2%5D+Distributed+by+Various+Yash+Raj+Films%5Ba%5D+Release+date+21+December+2018%5B4%5D+Running+time+164+minutes%5B5%5D+Country+India+Language+Hindi+Budget+%E2%82%B9200+crore%5B6%5D+Box+office+%E2%82%B9167.36+crore%5B7%5D+Zero+is+a+2018+Indian+Hindi-language+romantic+drama+film,+written+by+Himanshu+Sharma+and+directed+by+Aanand+L.+Rai.+It+was+jointly+produced+by+Colour+Yellow+Productions+and+Red+Chillies+Entertainment%27s+Gauri+Khan,+and+stars+Shah+Rukh+Khan,+Anushka+Sharma+and+Katrina+Kaif.+It+follows+Bauua+Singh,+a+short+man+from+Meerut+who,+after+having+difficulty+finding+a+marriage+partner,+finds+a+companion+in+Aafia+Bhinder,+a+NSAR+(a+fictional+space+research+facility)+scientist+with+cerebral+palsy.+However,+leading+superstar+Babita+also+gets+close+with+him,+testing+his+first+relationship.+This+love+triangle+takes+them+to+far-off+cities,+and+thrusts+Bauua+on+an+adventure+to+discover+both+his+true+love+and+completeness+in+a+life+lived+to+the+fullest.+Produced+on+an+budget+of+%E2%82%B9200+crore+(US%2428+million),+Zero+is+Khan%27s+most+expensive+film.+The+film+was+conceived+by+Rai+in+2012,+before+pre-production+began+in+2016.+Initially+having+a+working+title+of+Katrina+Meri+Jaan,+Zero+went+through+numerous+title+changes+before+arriving+at+the+final+title+in+early+2018.+Principal+photography+of+the+film+began+in+Mumbai+on+May+2017.+It+marked+the+last+film+appearance+of+Sridevi,+who+died+shortly+after+completing+the+film.+Filming+concluded+in+2018+at+Orlando.+The+film%27s+soundtrack+is+composed+by+Ajay-Atul+with+lyrics+written+by+Irshad+Kamil,+under+the+label+T-Series.+It+was+released+on+21+December+2018,+to+mixed+reviews+from+critics.+Critics+particularly+praised+the+film%27s+visual+effects+and+the+performances+of+Khan+and+Kaif,+but+the+screenplay+was+criticised+for+its+inconsistency.+It+earned+%E2%82%B990.39+crore+in+India+in+the+first+seven+days+after+its+release.%5B8%5D+Contents+1+Plot+2+Cast+2.1+Special+appearances+3+Production+3.1+Development+3.2+Casting+3.3+Principal+photography+4+Music+5+Release+5.1+Marketing+6+Reception+6.1+Critical+response+6.2+Box+office+7+Notes+8+References+9+External+links+Plot+Bauua+Singh+(Shahrukh+Khan)+is+a+short,+38-year-old+man+from+Meerut+who+has+trouble+finding+a+marriage+partner.+After+using+matrimonial+agencies+with+little+luck,+he+eventually+finds+his+companion+in+Aafia+Yusufzai+Bhinder+(Anushka+Sharma),+a+NASR+scientist+(a+fictionalized+depiction+of+NASA)+with+cerebral+palsy.+In+the+events+that+followed,+both+fall+in+love+with+each+other,+but+Bauua+dumps+her+after+five+months.+However,+Aafia+comes+looking+for+him,+and+Bauua%27s+parents+fix+their+marriage.+On+their+marriage+day,+Bauua%27s+friend+Guddu+(Mohammed+Zeeshan+Ayyub)+tells+him+that+he+is+shortlisted+for+a+dance+competition+where+he+applied,+where+the+winner+gets+a+chance+to+meet+Babita+Kumari+(Katrina+Kaif),+a+Bollywood+actress.+Bauua,+determined+to+meet+Babita,+runs+away+from+the+marriage+after+a+confrontation+with+Aafia,+leaving+everyone+devastated.+Bauua+wins+and+gets+to+meet+Babita+at+a+party,+accompanied+by+other+famous+Bollywood+actors.+Babita+offers+him+a+job+after+he+displays+an+ability+to+guess+what+goes+on+in+people%27s+mind+by+observing+their+expressions.+He+accompanies+her+on+film+schedules+and+award+functions,+helping+her+patch+up+with+her+ex-boyfriend+Aditya+Kapoor+(Abhay+Deol),+who+had+previously+cheated+on+her.+One+day,+Bauua+realizes+his+wrongdoings+and+wishing+to+reconcile+with+Aafia,+willingly+creates+an+argument+at+a+party+organized+by+Babita,+following+which+Babita+throws+him+out+and+breaks+all+ties+with+Aditya,+realizing+the+latter+is+cheating+on+her+again.+Bauua+and+Guddu+travel+to+New+York,+where+Aafia+is+attending+a+seminar.+Bauaa+crashes+the+seminar+to+meet+her,+but+Aafia+refuses+to+see+him.+Aafia%27s+father+tells+him+that+Bauua+has+fathered+a+son+with+Aafia+and+the+latter+is+pregnant,+due+to+which+she+wanted+him+to+marry+her+in+the+first+place.+A+heartbroken+Bauua+decides+to+leave+the+city,+but+decides+to+try+his+luck+one+more+time.+After+meeting+with+Aafia+again+at+NASR+and+getting+rejected+by+her,+Bauua+enlists+in+a+program+recruiting+human+volunteers+to+be+sent+to+Mars+on+a+rocket.+After+painstaking+training+and+getting+help+from+one+of+the+applicants,+Bauaa+gets+selected,+while+Guddu+is+rejected+for+his+vision+disability.+On+the+day+of+his+launch,+Aafia,+who+is+supposed+to+marry+Srinivasan+(R.+Madhavan),+a+fellow+scientist+and+Aafia%27s+colleague,+leaves+him,+and+she+reaches+NASR+seconds+before+Bauua%27s+launch.+Bauua+assures+her+that+he+always+loved+her,+just+before+the+rocket+takes+off.+The+launch+is+witnessed+by+Aafia,+Guddu+and+Srinivasan,+along+with+Babita+and+Bauua%27s+family+via+television+broadcast.+The+launch+is+successful,+and+the+rocket+thrusts+off+in+space.+In+a+voice-over+by+Aafia,+it+is+revealed+that+Bauua+eventually+reaches+Mars,+and+sends+a+video+recording+of+himself+from+there.+His+rocket+gets+lost+in+space+somewhere+while+returning,+and+Aafia+waits+for+him,+having+broken+her+marriage+with+Srinivasan.+Fifteen+years+later,+a+Chinese+space+station+receives+the+signal+of+Bauua%27s+escape+pod,+which+crash+lands+in+an+ocean,+revealing+Bauua+is+still+alive+and+has+not+aged.+Cast+Shah+Rukh+Khan+as+Bauua+Singh,+a+person+with+dwarfism%5B9%5D%5B10%5D+Anushka+Sharma+as+Aafia+Yusufzai+Bhinder,+a+NSAR+(a+fictionalized+depiction+of+NASA)+scientist+with+cerebral+palsy%5B11%5D%5B12%5D+Katrina+Kaif+as+Babita+Kumari,+an+alcoholic+Bollywood+actress%5B13%5D%5B14%5D+Mohammed+Zeeshan+Ayyub+as+Guddu+Singh%5B15%5D+Tigmanshu+Dhulia+as+Ashok+Singh,+Bauua%E2%80%99s+father%5B16%5D+Sheeba+Chaddha+as+Beena+Singh,+Bauua%27s+mother%5B17%5D+Brijendra+Kala+as+Pandey,+a+matrimonial+agent%5B18%5D%5B19%5D+Abhay+Deol+as+Aditya+Kapoor,+Babita%27s+love+interest%5B20%5D%5B21%5D+Special+appearances+R.+Madhavan%5B22%5D+as+Srinivasan,+Aafia%27s+fianc%C3%A9+and+fellow+scientist+Salman+Khan%5B23%5D+as+himself+judging+a+dance+show+Sushrii+Shreya+Mishraa+as+Aditya+Kapoor%27s+girlfriend%5B24%5D+Kajol%5B25%5D+as+herself+at+a+party+Rani+Mukerji%5B26%5D+as+herself+at+a+party+Sridevi%5B25%5D+as+herself+at+a+party+Alia+Bhatt%5B25%5D+as+herself+at+a+party+Karisma+Kapoor%5B25%5D+as+herself+at+a+party%22&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwji_6Hb7vDlAhXIvo8KHY1MDKEQ_AUoA3oECAkQBQ&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25#imgrc=_

From: Streak
Date: Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 2:10 PM
Subject: Someone just viewed: HELLO SUNDAR PICHAI, HAPY NEW YEAR TO EVEN SANAJY DUTT -> THI YEAR IS GOOD – KHAN MOVIE – WOW WELL I GUESS INDIA WONT PROGRESS BECASUE BAARCK HUSIEN DELCARED – THAT INDIA WILL PROGRESS IF THEY WACTH SHAHRUKH KHAN MOVIE, NOW IF BHARAT DOES THE CAHRM THEN IT WOULD BE CAKELD EHATW Page semi-protected Zero (2018 film) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search Zero Zero official poster.jpg Theatrical release poster Directed by Aanand L. Rai Produced by Gauri Khan Written by Himanshu Sharma Screenplay by Himanshu Sharma Starring Shah Rukh Khan Anushka Sharma Katrina Kaif Music by Original and background music: Ajay−Atul Guest composer: Tanishk Bagchi[1] Cinematography Manu Anand Edited by Hemal Kothari Production company Red Chillies E ntertainment Colour Yellow Productions[2] Distributed by Various Yash Raj Films[a] Release date 21 December 2018[4] Running time 164 minutes[5] Country India Language Hindi Budget ₹200 crore[6] Box o
To:

5c06a15b95c700eebb7b9823_headerLockup_2x.png

Someone just viewed: “HELLO SUNDAR PICHAI, HAPY NEW YEAR TO EVEN SANAJY DUTT -> THI YEAR IS GOOD – KHAN MOVIE – WOW WELL I GUESS INDIA WONT PROGRESS BECASUE BAARCK HUSIEN DELCARED – THAT INDIA WILL PROGRESS IF THEY WACTH SHAHRUKH KHAN MOVIE, NOW IF BHARAT DOES THE CAHRM THEN IT WOULD BE CAKELD EHATW Page semi-protected Zero (2018 film) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search Zero Zero official poster.jpg Theatrical release poster Directed by Aanand L. Rai Produced by Gauri Khan Written by Himanshu Sharma Screenplay by Himanshu Sharma Starring Shah Rukh Khan Anushka Sharma Katrina Kaif Music by Original and background music: Ajay−Atul Guest composer: Tanishk Bagchi[1] Cinematography Manu Anand Edited by Hemal Kothari Production company Red Chillies Entertainment Colour Yellow Productions[2] Distributed by Various Yash Raj Films[a] Release date 21 December 2018[4] Running time 164 minutes[5] Country India Language Hindi Budget ₹200 crore[6] Box office ₹167.36 crore[7] Zero is a 2018 Indian Hindi-language romantic drama film, written by Himanshu Sharma and directed by Aanand L. Rai. It was jointly produced by Colour Yellow Productions and Red Chillies Entertainment’s Gauri Khan, and stars Shah Rukh Khan, Anushka Sharma and Katrina Kaif. It follows Bauua Singh, a short man from Meerut who, after having difficulty finding a marriage partner, finds a companion in Aafia Bhinder, a NSAR (a fictional space research facility) scientist with cerebral palsy. However, leading superstar Babita also gets close with him, testing his first relationship. This love triangle takes them to far-off cities, and thrusts Bauua on an adventure to discover both his true love and completeness in a life lived to the fullest. Produced on an budget of ₹200 crore (US$28 million), Zero is Khan’s most expensive film. The film was conceived by Rai in 2012, before pre-production began in 2016. Initially having a working title of Katrina Meri Jaan, Zero went through numerous title changes before arriving at the final title in early 2018. Principal photography of the film began in Mumbai on May 2017. It marked the last film appearance of Sridevi, who died shortly after completing the film. Filming concluded in 2018 at Orlando. The film’s soundtrack is composed by Ajay-Atul with lyrics written by Irshad Kamil, under the label T-Series. It was released on 21 December 2018, to mixed reviews from critics. Critics particularly praised the film’s visual effects and the performances of Khan and Kaif, but the screenplay was criticised for its inconsistency. It earned ₹90.39 crore in India in the first seven days after its release.[8] Contents 1 Plot 2 Cast 2.1 Special appearances 3 Production 3.1 Development 3.2 Casting 3.3 Principal photography 4 Music 5 Release 5.1 Marketing 6 Reception 6.1 Critical response 6.2 Box office 7 Notes 8 References 9 External links Plot Bauua Singh (Shahrukh Khan) is a short, 38-year-old man from Meerut who has trouble finding a marriage partner. After using matrimonial agencies with little luck, he eventually finds his companion in Aafia Yusufzai Bhinder (Anushka Sharma), a NASR scientist (a fictionalized depiction of NASA) with cerebral palsy. In the events that followed, both fall in love with each other, but Bauua dumps her after five months. However, Aafia comes looking for him, and Bauua’s parents fix their marriage. On their marriage day, Bauua’s friend Guddu (Mohammed Zeeshan Ayyub) tells him that he is shortlisted for a dance competition where he applied, where the winner gets a chance to meet Babita Kumari (Katrina Kaif), a Bollywood actress. Bauua, determined to meet Babita, runs away from the marriage after a confrontation with Aafia, leaving everyone devastated. Bauua wins and gets to meet Babita at a party, accompanied by other famous Bollywood actors. Babita offers him a job after he displays an ability to guess what goes on in people’s mind by observing their expressions. He accompanies her on film schedules and award functions, helping her patch up with her ex-boyfriend Aditya Kapoor (Abhay Deol), who had previously cheated on her. One day, Bauua realizes his wrongdoings and wishing to reconcile with Aafia, willingly creates an argument at a party organized by Babita, following which Babita throws him out and breaks all ties with Aditya, realizing the latter is cheating on her again. Bauua and Guddu travel to New York, where Aafia is attending a seminar. Bauaa crashes the seminar to meet her, but Aafia refuses to see him. Aafia’s father tells him that Bauua has fathered a son with Aafia and the latter is pregnant, due to which she wanted him to marry her in the first place. A heartbroken Bauua decides to leave the city, but decides to try his luck one more time. After meeting with Aafia again at NASR and getting rejected by her, Bauua enlists in a program recruiting human volunteers to be sent to Mars on a rocket. After painstaking training and getting help from one of the applicants, Bauaa gets selected, while Guddu is rejected for his vision disability. On the day of his launch, Aafia, who is supposed to marry Srinivasan (R. Madhavan), a fellow scientist and Aafia’s colleague, leaves him, and she reaches NASR seconds before Bauua’s launch. Bauua assures her that he always loved her, just before the rocket takes off. The launch is witnessed by Aafia, Guddu and Srinivasan, along with Babita and Bauua’s family via television broadcast. The launch is successful, and the rocket thrusts off in space. In a voice-over by Aafia, it is revealed that Bauua eventually reaches Mars, and sends a video recording of himself from there. His rocket gets lost in space somewhere while returning, and Aafia waits for him, having broken her marriage with Srinivasan. Fifteen years later, a Chinese space station receives the signal of Bauua’s escape pod, which crash lands in an ocean, revealing Bauua is still alive and has not aged. Cast Shah Rukh Khan as Bauua Singh, a person with dwarfism[9][10] Anushka Sharma as Aafia Yusufzai Bhinder, a NSAR (a fictionalized depiction of NASA) scientist with cerebral palsy[11][12] Katrina Kaif as Babita Kumari, an alcoholic Bollywood actress[13][14] Mohammed Zeeshan Ayyub as Guddu Singh[15] Tigmanshu Dhulia as Ashok Singh, Bauua’s father[16] Sheeba Chaddha as Beena Singh, Bauua’s mother[17] Brijendra Kala as Pandey, a matrimonial agent[18][19] Abhay Deol as Aditya Kapoor, Babita’s love interest[20][21] Special appearances R. Madhavan[22] as Srinivasan, Aafia’s fiancé and fellow scientist Salman Khan[23] as himself judging a dance show Sushrii Shreya Mishraa as Aditya Kapoor’s girlfriend[24] Kajol[25] as herself at a party Rani Mukerji[26] as herself at a party Sridevi[25] as herself at a party Alia Bhatt[25] as herself at a party Karisma Kapoor[25] as herself at a party”

People on thread: Yoni Netanyahu Olga Blog Post By Email
Device: Unknown Device
Location: Quincy, WA

© 2011-2019 Streak
160 Pine Street, San Francisco, CA 94111

eyJlbWFpbF9pZCI6IlJNX3lBUUVBQVc1NGhTcGUyOF9OTE5TR0VmMEMzdz09In0=

Someone just viewed: Fwd: Someone just viewed: TO KATRINA KAIF AND SALMAN KHAN – SEE – AND THEN? CC : MADARCHOD HIJRE MEANS TARNSGENDER MEANS NUMBER 6 MEANS CHAKKE RSS – HINDU ETREMIST – PUSSY FUCK SISSY MAADRCHOD – BECHANHOD – AND TO TOUGH HINDU MOTHERFUCKERS AND KHAN MUSCLE MAN AND AMBANI WHORE OF 3RD WORLD – AMABNI IF U DONT HAVE SHAME – KEARN ANGLI SAXON SUPERIORITT OVER YOUR INFERIOR SKIN MADARCHOD AND TO UP CHIEF MISNISTER MAIYA KE LAUDE MEANS MAADRCHOD IF I WAS CM I WOULD HAVE BEEN ASHMAHED THAT THIS IS WHAT HAPENED TO SOMEONE WHOM OSTIEMS CALELD GANDHI SOMEONE CALL IUT BRAND BECAUDE ” BECAUSE U ALL CORRPUT MAADRCHOD – BOLY WOOD AND CRICKET AND WE LEAVE YOUR WHORE SHIT 3RD WORLD NATION CALELD HINDUSTAN – OK MAADRCOD – 3RD WORLD NATION PERSDIENT OF INDIA MOTHERFUCKING – THIS IS CALELD RUSSHAIN – HEARD WORD RUSHSIAN MAADRCHOD 3RD WORLD SHIT HOLE

https://www.google.com/search?q=TO+KATRINA+KAIF+AND+SALMAN+KHAN+-+SEE+-+AND+THEN%3F+CC+:+MADARCHOD+HIJRE+MEANS+TARNSGENDER+MEANS+NUMBER+6+MEANS+CHAKKE+RSS+-+HINDU+ETREMIST+-+PUSSY+FUCK+SISSY+MAADRCHOD+-+BECHANHOD+-+AND+TO+TOUGH+HINDU+MOTHERFUCKERS+AND+KHAN+MUSCLE+MAN+AND+AMBANI+WHORE+OF+3RD+WORLD+-+AMABNI+IF+U+DONT+HAVE+SHAME+-+KEARN+ANGLI+SAXON+SUPERIORITT+OVER+YOUR+INFERIOR+SKIN+MADARCHOD+AND+TO+UP+CHIEF+MISNISTER+MAIYA+KE+LAUDE+MEANS+MAADRCHOD+IF+I+WAS+CM+I+WOULD+HAVE+BEEN+ASHMAHED+THAT+THIS+IS+WHAT+HAPENED+TO+SOMEONE+WHOM+OSTIEMS+CALELD+GANDHI+SOMEONE+CALL+IUT+BRAND+BECAUDE+%22+BECAUSE+U+ALL+CORRPUT+MAADRCHOD+-+BOLY+WOOD+AND+CRICKET+AND+WE+LEAVE+YOUR+WHORE+SHIT+3RD+WORLD+NATION+CALELD+HINDUSTAN+-+OK+MAADRCOD+-+3RD+WORLD+NATION+PERSDIENT+OF+INDIA+MOTHERFUCKING+-+THIS+IS+CALELD+RUSSHAIN+-+HEARD+WORD+RUSHSIAN+MAADRCHOD+3RD+WORLD+SHIT+HOLE%22&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi1xI6T4fDlAhVEto8KHYvpC9cQ_AUoAnoECAMQBA&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25

From: Streak
Date: Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 1:03 PM
Subject: Someone just viewed: Fwd: Someone just viewed: TO KATRINA KAIF AND SALMAN KHAN – SEE – AND THEN? CC : MADARCHOD HIJRE MEANS TARNSGENDER MEANS NUMBER 6 MEANS CHAKKE RSS – HINDU ETREMIST – PUSSY FUCK SISSY MAADRCHOD – BECHANHOD – AND TO TOUGH HINDU MOTHERFUCKERS AND KHAN MUSCLE MAN AND AMBANI WHORE OF 3RD WORLD – AMABNI IF U DONT HAVE SHAME – KEARN ANGLI SAXON SUPERIORITT OVER YOUR INFERIOR SKIN MADARCHOD AND TO UP CHIEF MISNISTER MAIYA KE LAUDE MEANS MAADRCHOD IF I WAS CM I WOULD HAVE BEEN ASHMAHED THAT THIS IS WHAT HAPENED TO SOMEONE WHOM OSTIEMS CALELD GANDHI SOMEONE CALL IUT BRAND BECAUDE ” BECAUSE U ALL CORRPUT MAADRCHOD – BOLY WOOD AND CRICKET AND WE LEAVE YOUR WHORE SHIT 3RD WORLD NATION CALELD HINDUSTAN – OK MAADRCOD – 3RD WORLD NATION PERSDIENT OF INDIA MOTHERFUCKING – THIS IS CALELD RUSSHAIN – HEARD WORD RUSHSIAN MAADRCHOD 3RD WORLD SHIT HOLE
To:

5c06a15b95c700eebb7b9823_headerLockup_2x.png

Someone just viewed: “Fwd: Someone just viewed: TO KATRINA KAIF AND SALMAN KHAN – SEE – AND THEN? CC : MADARCHOD HIJRE MEANS TARNSGENDER MEANS NUMBER 6 MEANS CHAKKE RSS – HINDU ETREMIST – PUSSY FUCK SISSY MAADRCHOD – BECHANHOD – AND TO TOUGH HINDU MOTHERFUCKERS AND KHAN MUSCLE MAN AND AMBANI WHORE OF 3RD WORLD – AMABNI IF U DONT HAVE SHAME – KEARN ANGLI SAXON SUPERIORITT OVER YOUR INFERIOR SKIN MADARCHOD AND TO UP CHIEF MISNISTER MAIYA KE LAUDE MEANS MAADRCHOD IF I WAS CM I WOULD HAVE BEEN ASHMAHED THAT THIS IS WHAT HAPENED TO SOMEONE WHOM OSTIEMS CALELD GANDHI SOMEONE CALL IUT BRAND BECAUDE ” BECAUSE U ALL CORRPUT MAADRCHOD – BOLY WOOD AND CRICKET AND WE LEAVE YOUR WHORE SHIT 3RD WORLD NATION CALELD HINDUSTAN – OK MAADRCOD – 3RD WORLD NATION PERSDIENT OF INDIA MOTHERFUCKING – THIS IS CALELD RUSSHAIN – HEARD WORD RUSHSIAN MAADRCHOD 3RD WORLD SHIT HOLE”

People on thread: Yoni Netanyahu Olga Blog Post By Email
Device: Android Tablet
Location: Unknown

© 2011-2019 Streak
160 Pine Street, San Francisco, CA 94111

eyJlbWFpbF9pZCI6IlJNX3lBUUVBQVc1NFI3eWUyVzJwOVNwcjUydmZZZz09In0=

Someone just viewed: Re: AJAY, THIS IS SUCH COOL TELL ME WHAR ALL THEISE BECAUSE I WONT TO KNOW THIS – REGARDS HOTMAN

https://www.google.com/search?q=Re:+AJAY,+THIS+IS+SUCH+COOL+TELL+ME+WHAR+ALL+THEISE+BECAUSE+I+WONT+TO+KNOW+THIS+-+REGARDS+HOTMAN&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiFhMyE3fDlAhVf4zgGHXbGBeMQ_AUoA3oECCAQBQ&biw=1536&bih=754#imgrc=_

Someone just viewed: ABOUT OLYA SHULMAN LEDNICHENKO

https://www.google.com/search?pws=0&gl=us&tbm=isch&q=%22ABOUT+OLGA+SHULMAN+LEDNICHENKO%22&spell=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwipwMvf2PDlAhVhwjgGHUGtB24QBQg_KAA&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25#imgrc=_

From: Streak
Date: Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 12:32 PM
Subject: Someone just viewed: ABOUT OLYA SHULMAN LEDNICHENKO
To:

5c06a15b95c700eebb7b9823_headerLockup_2x.png

Someone just viewed: “ABOUT OLYA SHULMAN LEDNICHENKO”

People on thread: Yoni Netanyahu Olga Blog Post By Email
Device: Android Tablet
Location: Unknown

© 2011-2019 Streak
160 Pine Street, San Francisco, CA 94111

eyJlbWFpbF9pZCI6IlJNX3lBUUVBQVc1NEsxa3BkNWhWUVFYdFRPOXpTdz09In0=

Someone just viewed: OLGA SEE THIS – REGARDS HOTMAN

HOTMAN

THSIE SI SCUCH COOL

HOW U FIND OUT EVEYRTHING ABOUT CONSPEREECEIES AND RUMORSE AGAINST U AND WILLIME CLINTONEAND OLGA ?

TELL ME ALL I ASKED

REGARDS

KIKA AND JOHNNY SPECIAL FORCE SHINDOOS AND YURI AND NIKO AND FEIKO AND XZEIKO AND OTHER SCERTE FAREIENDHSEEPS FROM SECRETE LOCATIONES ON FRANCE AND IN ALEINES

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22OLGA+SEE+THIS+-+REGARDS+HOTMAN%22&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjKvIaN1vDlAhWKQY8KHahCCQkQ_AUoAnoECAQQBA&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25#imgrc=_

Someone just viewed: Re: HERE IS 18 HAILANOT NESHER ISRAEL

HELLO CHICAGO

AND BTW WHERE IS QUINCY AND LANGLEY TODAY ?

TAKING REST ?

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Re:+HERE+IS+18+HAILANOT+NESHER+ISRAEL%22&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjoofiy1PDlAhVxmuYKHYU1DIgQ_AUoAnoECAQQBA&biw=1536&bih=754

From: Streak
Date: Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 10:07 AM
Subject: Someone just viewed: Re: HERE IS 18 HAILANOT NESHER ISRAEL
To:

5c06a15b95c700eebb7b9823_headerLockup_2x.png

Someone just viewed: “Re: HERE IS 18 HAILANOT NESHER ISRAEL”

People on thread: Yoni Netanyahu Olga Blog Post By Email
Device: PC
Location: Chicago, IL

© 2011-2019 Streak
160 Pine Street, San Francisco, CA 94111

eyJlbWFpbF9pZCI6IlJNX3lBUUVBQVc1M3B5VExqUGhCc0wxX3I2SVFWdz09In0=

Someone just viewed: SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO:) https://vimeo.com/309649585 IS MY OLD MAN THERE ? :) SOOOOOOOOOOOOOO :) -> BARACK IS ALSO A NICE GUY, JUTS THAT – HE GOT TOO MANY ORTHOGONAL VECTORS, LIKE OLYA

HELLO CHICAGO

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO:)+https://vimeo.com/309649585+IS+MY+OLD+MAN+THERE+%3F+:)+SOOOOOOOOOOOOOO+:)+-%3E+BARACK+IS+ALSO+A+NICE+GUY,+JUTS+THAT+-+HE+GOT+TOO+MANY+ORTHOGONAL+VECTORS,+LIKE+OLYA+%22&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwihr4_n0_DlAhXCV3wKHQXaAO0Q_AUoAnoECAIQBA&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25#imgrc=DeQTMHupb_kLhM:

From: Streak
Date: Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 10:07 AM
Subject: Someone just viewed: SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO:) https://vimeo.com/309649585 IS MY OLD MAN THERE ? :) SOOOOOOOOOOOOOO :) -> BARACK IS ALSO A NICE GUY, JUTS THAT – HE GOT TOO MANY ORTHOGONAL VECTORS, LIKE OLYA
To:

5c06a15b95c700eebb7b9823_headerLockup_2x.png

Someone just viewed: “SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO:) https://vimeo.com/309649585 IS MY OLD MAN THERE ? :) SOOOOOOOOOOOOOO :) -> BARACK IS ALSO A NICE GUY, JUTS THAT – HE GOT TOO MANY ORTHOGONAL VECTORS, LIKE OLYA “

People on thread: Yoni Netanyahu Olga Blog Post By Email
Device: PC
Location: Chicago, IL

© 2011-2019 Streak
160 Pine Street, San Francisco, CA 94111

eyJlbWFpbF9pZCI6IlJNX3lBUUVBQVc1M3B5VExlbHBIZm00dHZPbzJxQT09In0=

Someone just viewed: OLGA SHULMAN LEDNICHENKO ANNE FRANK AND 18 HAILAOT DRIVE IN PLUS 972 AND WHO?

HELLO BIG SHOT FROM CHICAGO

HOW ARE U ?

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22OLGA+SHULMAN+LEDNICHENKO+ANNE+FRANK+AND+18+HAILAOT+DRIVE+IN+PLUS+972+AND+WHO%3F%22&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj56cqQ0_DlAhWJMo8KHeYNDWUQ_AUoAnoECAQQBA&biw=1536&bih=754

From: Streak
Date: Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 10:07 AM
Subject: Someone just viewed: OLGA SHULMAN LEDNICHENKO ANNE FRANK AND 18 HAILAOT DRIVE IN PLUS 972 AND WHO?
To:

5c06a15b95c700eebb7b9823_headerLockup_2x.png

Someone just viewed: “OLGA SHULMAN LEDNICHENKO ANNE FRANK AND 18 HAILAOT DRIVE IN PLUS 972 AND WHO?”

People on thread: Yoni Netanyahu Olga Blog Post By Email
Device: PC
Location: Chicago, IL

© 2011-2019 Streak
160 Pine Street, San Francisco, CA 94111

eyJlbWFpbF9pZCI6IlJNX3lBUUVBQVc1M3B5a0ROWlN3SnVrM09VNlF6UT09In0=

Someone just viewed: Fwd: Someone just viewed: 643361467 AND HERE IS 17 HAILANOT NESHER ISRAEL

HELLO CHICAGO

KAK DILA?

https://www.google.com/search?q=643361467+AND+HERE+IS+17+HAILANOT+NESHER+ISRAEL&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwirjv6vz_DlAhXe63MBHRhLD7YQ_AUoBHoECAcQBg&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25

THERE ARE MANY PAGES AND HERE IS THE LAST CELL ON LEFT BOTTOM

THE LAST BOTTOM LINK IS THIS – WOW ->

https://i2.wp.com/yoninetanyahu.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/YONI-NETANYAHU-MOVIE-12.jpg

THIS IS PRETTY COOL.. SNT IT ?

https://www.google.com/search?q=643361467+AND+HERE+IS+17+HAILANOT+NESHER+ISRAEL&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwirjv6vz_DlAhXe63MBHRhLD7YQ_AUoBHoECAcQBg&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25#imgrc=pxry7tQ2LQytzM:

SO NOW U HAVE 17 HAILANOT NESHER AND THE GUASSIAN PRIME NUMBER ALSO

From: Streak
Date: Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 10:07 AM
Subject: Someone just viewed: Fwd: Someone just viewed: 643361467 AND HERE IS 17 HAILANOT NESHER ISRAEL
To:

5c06a15b95c700eebb7b9823_headerLockup_2x.png

Someone just viewed: “Fwd: Someone just viewed: 643361467 AND HERE IS 17 HAILANOT NESHER ISRAEL”

People on thread: Yoni Netanyahu Olga Blog Post By Email
Device: PC
Location: Chicago, IL

© 2011-2019 Streak
160 Pine Street, San Francisco, CA 94111

eyJlbWFpbF9pZCI6IlJNX3lBUUVBQVc1M3B5eTFhS1dZWG5POTJNc0pSZz09In0=

Someone just viewed: Falsifiability/problem of demarcation Popper coined the term “critical rationalism” to describe his philosophy. Concerning the method of science, the term indicates his rejection of classical empiricism, and the classical observationalist-inductivist account of science that had grown out of it. Popper argued strongly against the latter, holding that scientific theories are abstract in nature, and can be tested only indirectly, by reference to their implications. He also held that scientific theory, and human knowledge generally, is irreducibly conjectural or hypothetical, and is generated by the creative imagination to solve problems that have arisen in specific historico-cultural settings. Logically, no number of positive outcomes at the level of experimental testing can confirm a scientific theory, but a single counterexample is logically decisive; it shows the theory, from which the implication is derived, to be false. To say that a given statement (e.g

I WILL SAY MORE ON THIS LATER, AS THIS IS A REALLY COOOL SUBAJCT, FOR HOTMAN ALSO

OLGA SHULMAN LENDICHENKO BILL CLINTON AJAY MISHRA BARACK OBAMA - SCIENTIFIC DISOVERY AND LOGIC MAPS

HELLO BIG SHOT FROM CHCAGO

JUST GOT UP, SELPT AROUND 4 AND A HALF HOURS..

SAW A FEW CLICKS FROM U –

I CANT WRITE MUCH, BUT TPOPPER WAS PRETTY PROPER IN HIS LOGIC AND IN PRESENATTION ..

OK. FYI – IS SANJAY THERE – OLGA THERE -> WELL THIS IS COMING FORM ONE OF THSOE LETERS, JSUT SO U KNOW BUBBA

ANYWAY, SO, YES. U CAN ARGUE YES. IF IF T ISFALSIFIABLE, THEN IT DOES IT MEAN THAT T IS FALSE – YES..

OK.. I JIT GOT UP..AND THERE IS A AWORD – CALELD – SUN WONT RISE TOMORROW :) – THATS A CONCCOCTION OF A THING THAT U STUDY AS PHILOSOPHER :)

TO A CERTAIN EXTEND, ONE CAN ASCERTAIN THAT NO AMOUNT OF EXPERIMENTS OR EXPERIMENSTATIONS, WILL STAIATE SOMEONE YES.. –

ANWAY, THIS ISA LONG TOPIC –

FOR NOW, KETS JUSTS AY SAY THAT THIS BODY OF WORDS, IS PRETTY PROFOND AND IN PHILSOPHY THE BEAUTY IS THAT ITS NOT RIGHT OT WRONG ANSWR – ITSNOT LIKE NEW TONS LAWS OR AAMTHS PROBLEM WHERE THERE IS SOME RIGHT ANSWERS AND MANY BAD AOR WRONG ASWNERS YES..

ANYWAY, SOMETIMES – AND FEYNMAN SAID THAT TOO – IF YOU HAVE AN ELEGANT THEORY, BUT IT DOESNT CONFORM WITH THE XPERIMENT, THEN NO MATETR WHAT YOU ARE – OR HOW ELEGANT LY YOU STATE WHAT U ARE AND WHAT U SAY, BUT ALSO EVENWHAT YOUR NAME IS – IT DOESNT ATETR IF IT DEOENST FIT WITH THE EXPRIMENT – EMANING ? WELL MENING TAT IF U HAVE A TEHORY – THAT IF SUCH AND SUCH CCONDITIONS ARE GERMANITED IN IARQ – OR LEBANON THEN – WWILL AHEV ROSES IN BAGH DAD, NOT POPY AND OPIUM IN AFGHAN, THEN – U CAN WRITE LONG – STRING OF WORDS WITH PORSENAD POETRY, BU IF LETS ASAY U DONE EXHUSTING AL YOUR RESPIR=UCES IN GERMNINATION OF NEW SHOOTS FROM NEWAND IMRPVED SEEDS FORM YOUR LHARD LABOR

BUT U DONT SEE THE DESIRED OR – RATEHR AS POPEPR MAY PREDICTED RESULT – THEN ? WELL THEN I GUESS TERE ARE ONLY TWO OPTIONS

[A] QUIT THAT THEORY OF BELIEFE, AS IT DIDNT FIT THE EXPEIRMENT

OR

[B] WELL, IF T IS FALSIABLE,S, DOESNT MENA T IS FALSE :) MEANING – INFINITY HASNT YET ARRIVED :) SOMETHING LIKE THAT-

:)

ALSO, WHAT STANDS OUT

AND YES SOME THINGS, DO NOT ELDN THESMELVE TO BE PROVEN FALSE OR NOR – IE, THEY CDONT STAIFY THE FALSIFIBILITY CRITERION

FOR EXAMPLE ?

WELL FOR EXAMPLE, THERE IA MVIE IN INDIA – CALELD NO ONE KILLED JESSCIA – AS AN EXAMPLE – NO ONE WENT TO JAI L , NEVER MIND THE EDAD BODY WAS BRIED ORACTUALLY CREMATED
NOW,

ALSO – THERE IS A TING ON TOLERANCE OF INTROLENCE – THOSE WORDS ARE PRETTY GOOD IN THIS POST

YEAH AND THERE IS THIS THING BELOW IT SAYS ISTRUE IS REPLAED BY ?

:)

I LOVE PHILOSPHY , AND ALSO WHAT FEYNMAN SAID ABOUT PHILOSPHERES :)

U KNOW MY MANFROM CHICAGO, SOTT F FITZERLAND SAID – INTELLEGENT EPRSONS WSHODL BE ABLE TO ACRRY BTOH TWO OPPOSING THROUGHTS SIMUTANEOUSLY AND AT THE SAME TIME IN TEHIR HEADS
:)
BUBBA, – HELLO BARACK – SO, IS A TRUE ? IS JOHN CALLED BARACK ? – DIDNT POPPER EXPLAIN OR POSIT SOMETHING ABOUT IS TRUE WORDS ?

ANWYAY, SO HERE IS WHAT I PROPSOSE, U KNOW WHEN LIITS OF COMUTAON S AND THOIGHTS AND EXPRIMENT HIT THEIR MAXXIMUM HORSE PWOER AND RESIRCES CRUNCH COMES IN

THEN UK KNOW WORD CAELD BAYESEIAN PROBABILITY? – THAT COULD BE SUED AS A GOOD – SATASYING TO SOUL WAY OF SAYING OK – ME NOW IS SATIATED IN MY QUEST FOR

[A] DISCOVERY AND ITS ENSUING COSTS

AND

[B] THE QUEST FOR TRUTH :)

AND THEN ?

WHAT THEN BARACK ?

AND U OLGA MEMSAHEB – WHAT DO U THINKS :)

IS SANJAY THERE -> SO MADARCHOD – LOST AND FOUND IN ISAREL OR AFGHAN OR IS IT YEMEN OR ABOTTABAD OR MUMABI AND PORTUGAL MAADRCHOD HEARD WORD BULAND BAGH AND 18 HAILOT AND 18 ERODE ?

HOW WAS MY LOGIC ANDDISCOEVRY BUBBA :)

.

.

HOW AS DISCOVERY CHANNEL ?

:)

OK NOW, I HAVE TO BRUSH MY TEETH AND TAKE ASHWOER AND DRINK TEA – AND ERED WHAT THE HECKI WROTE LAST NIGHT , LAST TNTIGHT I WAS VERY TIRED – SANDSORY IF I OFFENDED LIBERAL ARTS MAJORS, WELL, I DONT HAVE ANY ROBLEMS WITH LIBERAL ARTS – I LIKE ALL LIND SOF ETRETAINMENT, I JJUST DONT LIKE WHEN THEY SEE SOMETHING AND DO SELECTIVE – ABSOPRITION BECAUSE IT DOESNT FIT THEIR SOCIAL ENGINENERING ITEM SONGS .. THATS ALL.

ALSO, IF I GTE TIME, IF SOENE OS DEYING TO HEAR WHAT I WROTE OR THOUGT OR THINKS ON WHAT POPPER SAID, THEN I MAY HAVE TO GO SOMEHWERE TO FINF IKE 100 S OF PAGES ON SOME CRAP I WROTE WHEN I WAS 17 OR MAYBE 18 AT IIT FOR A CLASS ..

ANYWAY,

IS IT GOOD ENUF FOR NOW ?
,

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Falsifiability/problem+of+demarcation+Popper+coined+the+term+%22critical+rationalism%22+to+describe+his+philosophy.+Concerning+the+method+of+science,+the+term+indicates+his+rejection+of+classical+empiricism,+and+the+classical+observationalist-inductivist+account+of+science+that+had+grown+out+of+it.+Popper+argued+strongly+against+the+latter,+holding+that+scientific+theories+are+abstract+in+nature,+and+can+be+tested+only+indirectly,+by+reference+to+their+implications.+He+also+held+that+scientific+theory,+and+human+knowledge+generally,+is+irreducibly+conjectural+or+hypothetical,+and+is+generated+by+the+creative+imagination+to+solve+problems+that+have+arisen+in+specific+historico-cultural+settings.+Logically,+no+number+of+positive+outcomes+at+the+level+of+experimental+testing+can+confirm+a+scientific+theory,+but+a+single+counterexample+is+logically+decisive%3B+it+shows+the+theory,+from+which+the+implication+is+derived,+to+be+false.+To+say+that+a+given+statement+(e.g.,+the+statement+of+a+law+of+some+scientific+theory)%E2%80%94call+it+%22T%22%E2%80%94is+%22falsifiable%22+does+not+mean+that+%22T%22+is+false.+Rather,+it+means+that,+if+%22T%22+is+false,+then+(in+principle),+%22T%22+could+be+shown+to+be+false,+by+observation+or+by+experiment.+Popper%27s+account+of+the+logical+asymmetry+between+verification+and+falsifiability+lies+at+the+heart+of+his+philosophy+of+science.+It+also+inspired+him+to+take+falsifiability+as+his+criterion+of+demarcation+between+what+is,+and+is+not,+genuinely+scientific:+a+theory+should+be+considered+scientific+if,+and+only+if,+it+is+falsifiable.+This+led+him+to+attack+the+claims+of+both+psychoanalysis+and+contemporary+Marxism+to+scientific+status,+on+the+basis+that+their+theories+are+not+falsifiable.+Popper+also+wrote+extensively+against+the+famous+Copenhagen+interpretation+of+quantum+mechanics.+He+strongly+disagreed+with+Niels+Bohr%27s+instrumentalism+and+supported+Albert+Einstein%27s+realist+approach+to+scientific+theories+about+the+universe.+Popper%27s+falsifiability+resembles+Charles+Peirce%27s+nineteenth-century+fallibilism.+In+Of+Clocks+and+Clouds+(1966),+Popper+remarked+that+he+wished+he+had+known+of+Peirce%27s+work+earlier.+In+All+Life+is+Problem+Solving,+Popper+sought+to+explain+the+apparent+progress+of+scientific+knowledge%E2%80%94that+is,+how+it+is+that+our+understanding+of+the+universe+seems+to+improve+over+time.+This+problem+arises+from+his+position+that+the+truth+content+of+our+theories,+even+the+best+of+them,+cannot+be+verified+by+scientific+testing,+but+can+only+be+falsified.+Again,+in+this+context+the+word+%22falsified%22+does+not+refer+to+something+being+%22fake%22%3B+rather,+that+something+can+be+(i.e.,+is+capable+of+being)+shown+to+be+false+by+observation+or+experiment.+Some+things+simply+do+not+lend+themselves+to+being+shown+to+be+false,+and+therefore,+are+not+falsifiable.+If+so,+then+how+is+it+that+the+growth+of+science+appears+to+result+in+a+growth+in+knowledge%3F+In+Popper%27s+view,+the+advance+of+scientific+knowledge+is+an+evolutionary+process+characterised+by+his+formula:%5B40%5D%5B41%5D+%7B%5Cdisplaystyle+%5Cmathrm+%7BPS%7D+_%7B1%7D%5Crightarrow+%5Cmathrm+%7BTT%7D+_%7B1%7D%5Crightarrow+%5Cmathrm+%7BEE%7D+_%7B1%7D%5Crightarrow+%5Cmathrm+%7BPS%7D+_%7B2%7D.%5C,%7D+%5Cmathrm%7BPS%7D_1+%5Crightarrow+%5Cmathrm%7BTT%7D_1+%5Crightarrow+%5Cmathrm%7BEE%7D_1+%5Crightarrow+%5Cmathrm%7BPS%7D_2.+%5C,+In+response+to+a+given+problem+situation+(+%7B%5Cdisplaystyle+%5Cmathrm+%7BPS%7D+_%7B1%7D%7D+%5Cmathrm%7BPS%7D_1),+a+number+of+competing+conjectures,+or+tentative+theories+(+%7B%5Cdisplaystyle+%5Cmathrm+%7BTT%7D+%7D+%5Cmathrm%7BTT%7D),+are+systematically+subjected+to+the+most+rigorous+attempts+at+falsification+possible.+This+process,+error+elimination+(+%7B%5Cdisplaystyle+%5Cmathrm+%7BEE%7D+%7D+%5Cmathrm%7BEE%7D),+performs+a+similar+function+for+science+that+natural+selection+performs+for+biological+evolution.+Theories+that+better+survive+the+process+of+refutation+are+not+more+true,+but+rather,+more+%22fit%22%E2%80%94in+other+words,+more+applicable+to+the+problem+situation+at+hand+(+%7B%5Cdisplaystyle+%5Cmathrm+%7BPS%7D+_%7B1%7D%7D+%5Cmathrm%7BPS%7D_1).+Consequently,+just+as+a+species%27+biological+fitness+does+not+ensure+continued+survival,+neither+does+rigorous+testing+protect+a+scientific+theory+from+refutation+in+the+future.+Yet,+as+it+appears+that+the+engine+of+biological+evolution+has,+over+many+generations,+produced+adaptive+traits+equipped+to+deal+with+more+and+more+complex+problems+of+survival,+likewise,+the+evolution+of+theories+through+the+scientific+method+may,+in+Popper%27s+view,+reflect+a+certain+type+of+progress:+toward+more+and+more+interesting+problems+(+%7B%5Cdisplaystyle+%5Cmathrm+%7BPS%7D+_%7B2%7D%7D+%5Cmathrm%7BPS%7D_2).+For+Popper,+it+is+in+the+interplay+between+the+tentative+theories+(conjectures)+and+error+elimination+(refutation)+that+scientific+knowledge+advances+toward+greater+and+greater+problems%3B+in+a+process+very+much+akin+to+the+interplay+between+genetic+variation+and+natural+selection.+Falsification/problem+of+induction+Among+his+contributions+to+philosophy+is+his+claim+to+have+solved+the+philosophical+problem+of+induction.+He+states+that+while+there+is+no+way+to+prove+that+the+sun+will+rise,+it+is+possible+to+formulate+the+theory+that+every+day+the+sun+will+rise%3B+if+it+does+not+rise+on+some+particular+day,+the+theory+will+be+falsified+and+will+have+to+be+replaced+by+a+different+one.+Until+that+day,+there+is+no+need+to+reject+the+assumption+that+the+theory+is+true.+Nor+is+it+rational+according+to+Popper+to+make+instead+the+more+complex+assumption+that+the+sun+will+rise+until+a+given+day,+but+will+stop+doing+so+the+day+after,+or+similar+statements+with+additional+conditions.+Such+a+theory+would+be+true+with+higher+probability,+because+it+cannot+be+attacked+so+easily:+to+falsify+the+first+one,+it+is+sufficient+to+find+that+the+sun+has+stopped+rising%3B+to+falsify+the+second+one,+one+additionally+needs+the+assumption+that+the+given+day+has+not+yet+been+reached.+Popper+held+that+it+is+the+least+likely,+or+most+easily+falsifiable,+or+simplest+theory+(attributes+which+he+identified+as+all+the+same+thing)+that+explains+known+facts+that+one+should+rationally+prefer.+His+opposition+to+positivism,+which+held+that+it+is+the+theory+most+likely+to+be+true+that+one+should+prefer,+here+becomes+very+apparent.+It+is+impossible,+Popper+argues,+to+ensure+a+theory+to+be+true%3B+it+is+more+important+that+its+falsity+can+be+detected+as+easily+as+possible.+Popper+and+David+Hume+agreed+that+there+is+often+a+psychological+belief+that+the+sun+will+rise+tomorrow,+but+both+denied+that+there+is+logical+justification+for+the+supposition+that+it+will,+simply+because+it+always+has+in+the+past.+Popper+writes,+%22I+approached+the+problem+of+induction+through+Hume.+Hume,+I+felt,+was+perfectly+right+in+pointing+out+that+induction+cannot+be+logically+justified.%22+(Conjectures+and+Refutations,+p.+55)+Rationality+Popper+held+that+rationality+is+not+restricted+to+the+realm+of+empirical+or+scientific+theories,+but+that+it+is+merely+a+special+case+of+the+general+method+of+criticism,+the+method+of+finding+and+eliminating+contradictions+in+knowledge+without+ad-hoc-measures.+According+to+this+view,+rational+discussion+about+metaphysical+ideas,+about+moral+values+and+even+about+purposes+is+possible.+Popper%27s+student+W.W.+Bartley+III+tried+to+radicalise+this+idea+and+made+the+controversial+claim+that+not+only+can+criticism+go+beyond+empirical+knowledge,+but+that+everything+can+be+rationally+criticised.+To+Popper,+who+was+an+anti-justificationist,+traditional+philosophy+is+misled+by+the+false+principle+of+sufficient+reason.+He+thinks+that+no+assumption+can+ever+be+or+needs+ever+to+be+justified,+so+a+lack+of+justification+is+not+a+justification+for+doubt.+Instead,+theories+should+be+tested+and+scrutinised.+It+is+not+the+goal+to+bless+theories+with+claims+of+certainty+or+justification,+but+to+eliminate+errors+in+them.+He+writes,+%22there+are+no+such+things+as+good+positive+reasons%3B+nor+do+we+need+such+things+%5B…%5D+But+%5Bphilosophers%5D+obviously+cannot+quite+bring+%5Bthemselves%5D+to+believe+that+this+is+my+opinion,+let+alone+that+it+is+right.%22+(The+Philosophy+of+Karl+Popper,+p.+1043)+Philosophy+of+arithmetic+Popper%27s+principle+of+falsifiability+runs+into+prima+facie+difficulties+when+the+epistemological+status+of+mathematics+is+considered.+It+is+difficult+to+conceive+how+simple+statements+of+arithmetic,+such+as+%222+%2B+2+%3D+4%22,+could+ever+be+shown+to+be+false.+If+they+are+not+open+to+falsification+they+can+not+be+scientific.+If+they+are+not+scientific,+it+needs+to+be+explained+how+they+can+be+informative+about+real+world+objects+and+events.+Popper%27s+solution%5B42%5D+was+an+original+contribution+in+the+philosophy+of+mathematics.+His+idea+was+that+a+number+statement+such+as+%222+apples+%2B+2+apples+%3D+4+apples%22+can+be+taken+in+two+senses.+In+one+sense+it+is+irrefutable+and+logically+true,+in+the+second+sense+it+is+factually+true+and+falsifiable.+Concisely,+the+pure+mathematics+%222+%2B+2+%3D+4%22+is+always+true,+but,+when+the+formula+is+applied+to+real-world+apples,+it+is+open+to+falsification.%5B43%5D+Political+philosophy+In+The+Open+Society+and+Its+Enemies+and+The+Poverty+of+Historicism,+Popper+developed+a+critique+of+historicism+and+a+defence+of+the+%22Open+Society%22.+Popper+considered+historicism+to+be+the+theory+that+history+develops+inexorably+and+necessarily+according+to+knowable+general+laws+towards+a+determinate+end.+He+argued+that+this+view+is+the+principal+theoretical+presupposition+underpinning+most+forms+of+authoritarianism+and+totalitarianism.+He+argued+that+historicism+is+founded+upon+mistaken+assumptions+regarding+the+nature+of+scientific+law+and+prediction.+Since+the+growth+of+human+knowledge+is+a+causal+factor+in+the+evolution+of+human+history,+and+since+%22no+society+can+predict,+scientifically,+its+own+future+states+of+knowledge%22,%5B44%5D+it+follows,+he+argued,+that+there+can+be+no+predictive+science+of+human+history.+For+Popper,+metaphysical+and+historical+indeterminism+go+hand+in+hand.+In+his+early+years+Popper+was+impressed+by+Marxism,+whether+of+Communists+or+socialists.+An+event+that+happened+in+1919+had+a+profound+effect+on+him:+During+a+riot,+caused+by+the+Communists,+the+police+shot+several+unarmed+people,+including+some+of+Popper%27s+friends,+when+they+tried+to+free+party+comrades+from+prison.+The+riot+had,+in+fact,+been+part+of+a+plan+by+which+leaders+of+the+Communist+party+with+connections+to+B%C3%A9la+Kun+tried+to+take+power+by+a+coup%3B+Popper+did+not+know+about+this+at+that+time.+However,+he+knew+that+the+riot+instigators+were+swayed+by+the+Marxist+doctrine+that+class+struggle+would+produce+vastly+more+dead+men+than+the+inevitable+revolution+brought+about+as+quickly+as+possible,+and+so+had+no+scruples+to+put+the+life+of+the+rioters+at+risk+to+achieve+their+selfish+goal+of+becoming+the+future+leaders+of+th&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiw79HYv_DlAhVIknAKHUgTCToQ_AUoAnoECAYQBA&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25#imgrc=_

.

From: Streak
Date: Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 10:07 AM
Subject: Someone just viewed: Falsifiability/problem of demarcation Popper coined the term “critical rationalism” to describe his philosophy. Concerning the method of science, the term indicates his rejection of classical empiricism, and the classical observationalist-inductivist account of science that had grown out of it. Popper argued strongly against the latter, holding that scientific theories are abstract in nature, and can be tested only indirectly, by reference to their implications. He also held that scientific theory, and human knowledge generally, is irreducibly conjectural or hypothetical, and is generated by the creative imagination to solve problems that have arisen in specific historico-cultural settings. Logically, no number of positive outcomes at the level of experimental testing can confirm a scientific theory, but a single counterexample is logically decisive; it shows the theory, from which the implication is derived, to be false. To say that a given statement (e.g.,
To:

5c06a15b95c700eebb7b9823_headerLockup_2x.png

Someone just viewed: “Falsifiability/problem of demarcation Popper coined the term “critical rationalism” to describe his philosophy. Concerning the method of science, the term indicates his rejection of classical empiricism, and the classical observationalist-inductivist account of science that had grown out of it. Popper argued strongly against the latter, holding that scientific theories are abstract in nature, and can be tested only indirectly, by reference to their implications. He also held that scientific theory, and human knowledge generally, is irreducibly conjectural or hypothetical, and is generated by the creative imagination to solve problems that have arisen in specific historico-cultural settings. Logically, no number of positive outcomes at the level of experimental testing can confirm a scientific theory, but a single counterexample is logically decisive; it shows the theory, from which the implication is derived, to be false. To say that a given statement (e.g., the statement of a law of some scientific theory)—call it “T”—is “falsifiable” does not mean that “T” is false. Rather, it means that, if “T” is false, then (in principle), “T” could be shown to be false, by observation or by experiment. Popper’s account of the logical asymmetry between verification and falsifiability lies at the heart of his philosophy of science. It also inspired him to take falsifiability as his criterion of demarcation between what is, and is not, genuinely scientific: a theory should be considered scientific if, and only if, it is falsifiable. This led him to attack the claims of both psychoanalysis and contemporary Marxism to scientific status, on the basis that their theories are not falsifiable. Popper also wrote extensively against the famous Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. He strongly disagreed with Niels Bohr’s instrumentalism and supported Albert Einstein’s realist approach to scientific theories about the universe. Popper’s falsifiability resembles Charles Peirce’s nineteenth-century fallibilism. In Of Clocks and Clouds (1966), Popper remarked that he wished he had known of Peirce’s work earlier. In All Life is Problem Solving, Popper sought to explain the apparent progress of scientific knowledge—that is, how it is that our understanding of the universe seems to improve over time. This problem arises from his position that the truth content of our theories, even the best of them, cannot be verified by scientific testing, but can only be falsified. Again, in this context the word “falsified” does not refer to something being “fake”; rather, that something can be (i.e., is capable of being) shown to be false by observation or experiment. Some things simply do not lend themselves to being shown to be false, and therefore, are not falsifiable. If so, then how is it that the growth of science appears to result in a growth in knowledge? In Popper’s view, the advance of scientific knowledge is an evolutionary process characterised by his formula:[40][41] {displaystyle mathrm {PS} _{1}rightarrow mathrm {TT} _{1}rightarrow mathrm {EE} _{1}rightarrow mathrm {PS} _{2}.,} mathrm{PS}_1 rightarrow mathrm{TT}_1 rightarrow mathrm{EE}_1 rightarrow mathrm{PS}_2. , In response to a given problem situation ( {displaystyle mathrm {PS} _{1}} mathrm{PS}_1), a number of competing conjectures, or tentative theories ( {displaystyle mathrm {TT} } mathrm{TT}), are systematically subjected to the most rigorous attempts at falsification possible. This process, error elimination ( {displaystyle mathrm {EE} } mathrm{EE}), performs a similar function for science that natural selection performs for biological evolution. Theories that better survive the process of refutation are not more true, but rather, more “fit”—in other words, more applicable to the problem situation at hand ( {displaystyle mathrm {PS} _{1}} mathrm{PS}_1). Consequently, just as a species’ biological fitness does not ensure continued survival, neither does rigorous testing protect a scientific theory from refutation in the future. Yet, as it appears that the engine of biological evolution has, over many generations, produced adaptive traits equipped to deal with more and more complex problems of survival, likewise, the evolution of theories through the scientific method may, in Popper’s view, reflect a certain type of progress: toward more and more interesting problems ( {displaystyle mathrm {PS} _{2}} mathrm{PS}_2). For Popper, it is in the interplay between the tentative theories (conjectures) and error elimination (refutation) that scientific knowledge advances toward greater and greater problems; in a process very much akin to the interplay between genetic variation and natural selection. Falsification/problem of induction Among his contributions to philosophy is his claim to have solved the philosophical problem of induction. He states that while there is no way to prove that the sun will rise, it is possible to formulate the theory that every day the sun will rise; if it does not rise on some particular day, the theory will be falsified and will have to be replaced by a different one. Until that day, there is no need to reject the assumption that the theory is true. Nor is it rational according to Popper to make instead the more complex assumption that the sun will rise until a given day, but will stop doing so the day after, or similar statements with additional conditions. Such a theory would be true with higher probability, because it cannot be attacked so easily: to falsify the first one, it is sufficient to find that the sun has stopped rising; to falsify the second one, one additionally needs the assumption that the given day has not yet been reached. Popper held that it is the least likely, or most easily falsifiable, or simplest theory (attributes which he identified as all the same thing) that explains known facts that one should rationally prefer. His opposition to positivism, which held that it is the theory most likely to be true that one should prefer, here becomes very apparent. It is impossible, Popper argues, to ensure a theory to be true; it is more important that its falsity can be detected as easily as possible. Popper and David Hume agreed that there is often a psychological belief that the sun will rise tomorrow, but both denied that there is logical justification for the supposition that it will, simply because it always has in the past. Popper writes, “I approached the problem of induction through Hume. Hume, I felt, was perfectly right in pointing out that induction cannot be logically justified.” (Conjectures and Refutations, p. 55) Rationality Popper held that rationality is not restricted to the realm of empirical or scientific theories, but that it is merely a special case of the general method of criticism, the method of finding and eliminating contradictions in knowledge without ad-hoc-measures. According to this view, rational discussion about metaphysical ideas, about moral values and even about purposes is possible. Popper’s student W.W. Bartley III tried to radicalise this idea and made the controversial claim that not only can criticism go beyond empirical knowledge, but that everything can be rationally criticised. To Popper, who was an anti-justificationist, traditional philosophy is misled by the false principle of sufficient reason. He thinks that no assumption can ever be or needs ever to be justified, so a lack of justification is not a justification for doubt. Instead, theories should be tested and scrutinised. It is not the goal to bless theories with claims of certainty or justification, but to eliminate errors in them. He writes, “there are no such things as good positive reasons; nor do we need such things […] But [philosophers] obviously cannot quite bring [themselves] to believe that this is my opinion, let alone that it is right.” (The Philosophy of Karl Popper, p. 1043) Philosophy of arithmetic Popper’s principle of falsifiability runs into prima facie difficulties when the epistemological status of mathematics is considered. It is difficult to conceive how simple statements of arithmetic, such as “2 + 2 = 4”, could ever be shown to be false. If they are not open to falsification they can not be scientific. If they are not scientific, it needs to be explained how they can be informative about real world objects and events. Popper’s solution[42] was an original contribution in the philosophy of mathematics. His idea was that a number statement such as “2 apples + 2 apples = 4 apples” can be taken in two senses. In one sense it is irrefutable and logically true, in the second sense it is factually true and falsifiable. Concisely, the pure mathematics “2 + 2 = 4” is always true, but, when the formula is applied to real-world apples, it is open to falsification.[43] Political philosophy In The Open Society and Its Enemies and The Poverty of Historicism, Popper developed a critique of historicism and a defence of the “Open Society”. Popper considered historicism to be the theory that history develops inexorably and necessarily according to knowable general laws towards a determinate end. He argued that this view is the principal theoretical presupposition underpinning most forms of authoritarianism and totalitarianism. He argued that historicism is founded upon mistaken assumptions regarding the nature of scientific law and prediction. Since the growth of human knowledge is a causal factor in the evolution of human history, and since “no society can predict, scientifically, its own future states of knowledge”,[44] it follows, he argued, that there can be no predictive science of human history. For Popper, metaphysical and historical indeterminism go hand in hand. In his early years Popper was impressed by Marxism, whether of Communists or socialists. An event that happened in 1919 had a profound effect on him: During a riot, caused by the Communists, the police shot several unarmed people, including some of Popper’s friends, when they tried to free party comrades from prison. The riot had, in fact, been part of a plan by which leaders of the Communist party with connections to Béla Kun tried to take power by a coup; Popper did not know about this at that time. However, he knew that the riot instigators were swayed by the Marxist doctrine that class struggle would produce vastly more dead men than the inevitable revolution brought about as quickly as possible, and so had no scruples to put the life of the rioters at risk to achieve their selfish goal of becoming the future leaders of the working class. This was the start of his later criticism of historicism.[45][46] Popper began to reject Marxist historicism, which he associated with questionable means, and later socialism, which he associated with placing equality before freedom (to the possible disadvantage of equality).[47] In 1947, Popper co-founded the Mont Pelerin Society, with Friedrich Hayek, Milton Friedman, Ludwig von Mises and others, although he did not fully agree with the think tank’s charter and ideology. Specifically, he unsuccessfully recommended that socialists should be invited to participate, and that emphasis should be put on a hierarchy of humanitarian values rather than advocacy of a free market as envisioned by classical liberalism.[48] The paradox of tolerance Main article: Paradox of tolerance Although Popper was an advocate of toleration, he said that intolerance should not be tolerated, for if tolerance allowed intolerance to succeed completely, tolerance would be threatened. In The Open Society and Its Enemies, he argued: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.[49][50][51][52] Metaphysics Truth As early as 1934, Popper wrote of the search for truth as “one of the strongest motives for scientific discovery.”[53] Still, he describes in Objective Knowledge (1972) early concerns about the much-criticised notion of truth as correspondence. Then came the semantic theory of truth formulated by the logician Alfred Tarski and published in 1933. Popper wrote of learning in 1935 of the consequences of Tarski’s theory, to his intense joy. The theory met critical objections to truth as correspondence and thereby rehabilitated it. The theory also seemed, in Popper’s eyes, to support metaphysical realism and the regulative idea of a search for truth. According to this theory, the conditions for the truth of a sentence as well as the sentences themselves are part of a metalanguage. So, for example, the sentence “Snow is white” is true if and only if snow is white. Although many philosophers have interpreted, and continue to interpret, Tarski’s theory as a deflationary theory, Popper refers to it as a theory in which “is true” is replaced with “corresponds to the facts”. He bases this interpretation on the fact that examples such as the one described above refer to two things: assertions and the facts to which they refer. He identifies Tarski’s formulation of the truth conditions of sentences as the introduction of a “metalinguistic predicate” and distinguishes the following cases: “John called” is true. “It is true that John called.” The first case belongs to the metalanguage whereas the second is more likely to belong to the object language. Hence, “it is true that” possesses the logical status of a redundancy. “Is true”, on the other hand, is a predicate necessary for making general observations such as “John was telling the truth about Phillip.” Upon this basis, along with that of the logical content of assertions (where logical content is inversely proportional to probability), Popper went on to develop his important notion of verisimilitude or “truthlikeness”. The intuitive idea behind verisimilitude is that the assertions or hypotheses of scientific theories can be objectively measured with respect to the amount of truth and falsity that they imply. And, in this way, one theory can be evaluated as more or less true than another on a quantitative basis which, Popper emphasises forcefully, has nothing to do with “subjective probabilities” or other merely “epistemic” considerations. The simplest mathematical formulation that Popper gives of this concept can be found in the tenth chapter of Conjectures and Refutations. Here he defines it as: {displaystyle {mathit {Vs}}(a)={mathit {CT}}_{v}(a)-{mathit {CT}}_{f}(a),} mathit{Vs}(a)=mathit{CT}_v(a)-mathit{CT}_f(a) , where {displaystyle {mathit {Vs}}(a)} mathit{Vs}(a) is the verisimilitude of a, {displaystyle {mathit {CT}}_{v}(a)} mathit{CT}_v(a) is a measure of the content of the truth of a, and {displaystyle {mathit {CT}}_{f}(a)} mathit{CT}_f(a) is a measure of the content of the falsity of a. Popper’s original attempt to define not just verisimilitude, but an actual measure of it, turned out to be inadequate. However, it inspired a wealth of new attempts.[13] Popper’s three worlds Main article: Popper’s three worlds Knowledge, for Popper, was objective, both in the sense that it is objectively true (or truthlike), and also in the sense that knowledge has an ontological status (i.e., knowledge as object) independent of the knowing subject (Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, 1972). He proposed three worlds:[54] World One, being the physical world, or physical states; World Two, being the world of mind, or mental states, ideas, and perceptions; and World Three, being the body of human knowledge expressed in its manifold forms, or the products of the second world made manifest in the materials of the first world (i.e., books, papers, paintings, symphonies, and all the products of the human mind). World Three, he argued, was the product of individual human beings in exactly the same sense that an animal path is the product of individual animals, and that, as such, has an existence and evolution independent of any individual knowing subjects. The influence of World Three, in his view, on the individual human mind (World Two) is at least as strong as the influence of World One. In other words, the knowledge held by a given individual mind owes at least as much to the total accumulated wealth of human knowledge, made manifest, as to the world of direct experience. As such, the growth of human knowledge could be said to be a function of the independent evolution of World Three. Many contemporary philosophers, such as Daniel Dennett, have not embraced Popper’s Three World conjecture, due mostly, it seems, to its resemblance to mind-body dualism. Origin and evolution of life This section may be too long to read and navigate comfortably. Please consider splitting content into sub-articles, condensing it, or adding or removing subheadings. (January 2018) The creation–evolution controversy in the United States raises the issue of whether creationistic ideas may be legitimately called science and whether evolution itself may be legitimately called science. In the debate, both sides and even courts in their decisions have frequently invoked Popper’s criterion of falsifiability (see Daubert standard). In this context, passages written by Popper are frequently quoted in which he speaks about such issues himself. For example, he famously stated “Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research program—a possible framework for testable scientific theories.” He continued: And yet, the theory is invaluable. I do not see how, without it, our knowledge could have grown as it has done since Darwin. In trying to explain experiments with bacteria which become adapted to, say, penicillin, it is quite clear that we are greatly helped by the theory of natural selection. Although it is metaphysical, it sheds much light upon very concrete and very practical researches. It allows us to study adaptation to a new environment (such as a penicillin-infested environment) in a rational way: it suggests the existence of a mechanism of adaptation, and it allows us even to study in detail the mechanism at work.[55] He also noted that theism, presented as explaining adaptation, “was worse than an open admission of failure, for it created the impression that an ultimate explanation had been reached”.[56] Popper later said: When speaking here of Darwinism, I shall speak always of today’s theory—that is Darwin’s own theory of natural selection supported by the Mendelian theory of heredity, by the theory of the mutation and recombination of genes in a gene pool, and by the decoded genetic code. This is an immensely impressive and powerful theory. The claim that it completely explains evolution is of course a bold claim, and very far from being established. All scientific theories are conjectures, even those that have successfully passed many severe and varied tests. The Mendelian underpinning of modern Darwinism has been well tested, and so has the theory of evolution which says that all terrestrial life has evolved from a few primitive unicellular organisms, possibly even from one single organism.[56] In 1974, regarding DNA and the origin of life he said: What makes the origin of life and of the genetic code a disturbing riddle is this: the genetic code is without any biological function unless it is translated; that is, unless it leads to the synthesis of the proteins whose structure is laid down by the code. But, as Monod points out, the machinery by which the cell (at least the non-primitive cell, which is the only one we know) translates the code “consists of at least fifty macromolecular components which are themselves coded in the DNA”. (Monod, 1970;[57] 1971, 143[58]) Thus the code can not be translated except by using certain products of its translation. This constitutes a really baffling circle; a vicious circle, it seems, for any attempt to form a model, or theory, of the genesis of the genetic code. Thus we may be faced with the possibility that the origin of life (like the origin of the universe) becomes an impenetrable barrier to science, and a residue to all attempts to reduce biology to chemistry and physics.[59] He explained that the difficulty of testing had led some people to describe natural selection as a tautology, and that he too had in the past described the theory as “almost tautological”, and had tried to explain how the theory could be untestable (as is a tautology) and yet of great scientific interest: My solution was that the doctrine of natural selection is a most successful metaphysical research programme. It raises detailed problems in many fields, and it tells us what we would expect of an acceptable solution of these problems. I still believe that natural selection works in this way as a research programme. Nevertheless, I have changed my mind about the testability and logical status of the theory of natural selection; and I am glad to have an opportunity to make a recantation.[56] Popper summarised his new view as follows: The theory of natural selection may be so formulated that it is far from tautological. In this case it is not only testable, but it turns out to be not strictly universally true. There seem to be exceptions, as with so many biological theories; and considering the random character of the variations on which natural selection operates, the occurrence of exceptions is not surprising. Thus not all phenomena of evolution are explained by natural selection alone. Yet in every particular case it is a challenging research program to show how far natural selection can possibly be held responsible for the evolution of a particular organ or behavioural program.[60] These frequently quoted passages are only a very s”

People on thread: Yoni Netanyahu Olga Blog Post By Email
Device: PC
Location: Chicago, IL

© 2011-2019 Streak
160 Pine Street, San Francisco, CA 94111

eyJlbWFpbF9pZCI6IlJNX3lBUUVBQVc1M3B5eTFxS1RENDNCbFRYOUh5Zz09In0=

Someone just viewed: Fwd: Someone just viewed: “Dead” and “Dying” redirect here. For the coloring process, see Dyeing. For other uses, see Dead (disambiguation) and Death (disambiguation).

HELLO QUINCY AND THE OTHER UNNOWN CLICKER

https://www.google.com/search?pws=0&gl=us&biw=1536&bih=754&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=bYfQXcO1FIaT4-EP7IaCwAU&q=324368521+%22Dead%22+and+%22Dying%22+redirect+here.+For+the+coloring+process%2C+see+Dyeing.+For+other+uses%2C+see+Dead+%28disambiguation%29+and+Death+%28disambiguation%29.%22&oq=324368521+%22Dead%22+and+%22Dying%22+redirect+here.+For+the+coloring+process%2C+see+Dyeing.+For+other+uses%2C+see+Dead+%28disambiguation%29+and+Death+%28disambiguation%29.%22&gs_l=img.3…22558.30171..31911…0.0..0.0.0…….10….1..gws-wiz-img.9gr8_cP8VPg&ved=0ahUKEwiDoNCz8u_lAhWGyTgGHWyDAFgQ4dUDCAc&uact=5

Someone just viewed: SUNDAR PIAHCI AND GOOGLE SHIT WHEN THE FUCK WAS WEB INVENTED AND WHAT DID OBAA TEACH U ON INTERNETS ? -> CLICK GOOGLE https://i1.wp.com/yoninetanyahu.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/wow

OH LA,

HOLLYWOOD LAND

MAKE OLGA FEEL SEPCIAL ON HER BIRTHDAY IS IT CHRISTMAS BTW

,

OK THIS IS MY LAST RESPODNE I AM GOING TO BED.. AND SRRY LA U HAVE MANY LCLIKS, BUT I WAS BUSY WITH OTHER CLCIKS, BUT THIS IS IMPORTANT

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22SUNDAR+PIAHCI+AND+GOOGLE+SHIT+WHEN+THE+FUCK+WAS+WEB+INVENTED+AND+WHAT+DID+OBAA+TEACH+U+ON+INTERNETS+%3F+-%3E+CLICK+GOOGLE+https://i1.wp.com/yoninetanyahu.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/wow.jpg%22&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwikg9S58O_lAhVErY8KHcBmDmEQ_AUoAnoECAMQBA&biw=1536&bih=754#imgrc=_

.
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22SUNDAR+PIAHCI+AND+GOOGLE+SHIT+WHEN+THE+FUCK+WAS+WEB+INVENTED+AND+WHAT+DID+OBAA+TEACH+U+ON+INTERNETS+%3F+-%3E+CLICK+GOOGLE+https://i1.wp.com/yoninetanyahu.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/wow.jpg%22&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwikg9S58O_lAhVErY8KHcBmDmEQ_AUoAnoECAMQBA&biw=1536&bih=754#imgrc=_

.

From: Streak
Date: Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 4:42 AM
Subject: Someone just viewed: SUNDAR PIAHCI AND GOOGLE SHIT WHEN THE FUCK WAS WEB INVENTED AND WHAT DID OBAA TEACH U ON INTERNETS ? -> CLICK GOOGLE https://i1.wp.com/yoninetanyahu.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/wow.jpg
To:

5c06a15b95c700eebb7b9823_headerLockup_2x.png

Someone just viewed: “SUNDAR PIAHCI AND GOOGLE SHIT WHEN THE FUCK WAS WEB INVENTED AND WHAT DID OBAA TEACH U ON INTERNETS ? -> CLICK GOOGLE https://i1.wp.com/yoninetanyahu.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/wow.jpg

People on thread: Yoni Netanyahu Olga Blog Post By Email
Device: iPhone
Location: Los angeles, CA

© 2011-2019 Streak
160 Pine Street, San Francisco, CA 94111

eyJlbWFpbF9pZCI6IlJNX3lBUUVBQVc1MmZUMW9JS3o3ZkJwbjctSGdSQT09In0=

Someone just viewed: ABOUT OLGA SHULMAN LEDNICHENKO AND SANJAY DUTT

https://www.google.com/search?q=ABOUT+OLGA+SHULMAN+LEDNICHENKO+AND+SANJAY+DUTT&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjfvK-u7u_lAhWBsY8KHWU2CgAQ_AUoAnoECA4QBA&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25

https://www.google.com/search?q=ABOUT+OLGA+SHULMAN+LEDNICHENKO+AND+SANJAY+DUTT&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjfvK-u7u_lAhWBsY8KHWU2CgAQ_AUoAnoECA4QBA&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25

https://www.google.com/search?q=ABOUT+OLGA+SHULMAN+LEDNICHENKO+AND+SANJAY+DUTT&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjfvK-u7u_lAhWBsY8KHWU2CgAQ_AUoAnoECA4QBA&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25

From: Streak
Date: Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 4:25 AM
Subject: Someone just viewed: ABOUT OLGA SHULMAN LEDNICHENKO AND SANJAY DUTT
To:

5c06a15b95c700eebb7b9823_headerLockup_2x.png

Someone just viewed: “ABOUT OLGA SHULMAN LEDNICHENKO AND SANJAY DUTT”

People on thread: Yoni Netanyahu Olga Blog Post By Email
Device: Android Tablet
Location: Unknown

© 2011-2019 Streak
160 Pine Street, San Francisco, CA 94111

eyJlbWFpbF9pZCI6IlJNX3lBUUVBQVc1MmJXM1RlVWZOeTlZc09ZU19aQT09In0=

https://westhavendrivepropertymanagement.wordpress.com/2019/11/16/someone-just-viewed-from-olga-and-ajay-a-message-for-all-aspirants-for-any-meaning-and-desire-to-change-not-for-the-sake-of-changing-but-for-the-sake-of-making-things-better-be-it-2020-and-us/

https://westhavendrivepropertymanagement.wordpress.com/2019/11/16/someone-just-viewed-from-olga-and-ajay-a-message-for-all-aspirants-for-any-meaning-and-desire-to-change-not-for-the-sake-of-changing-but-for-the-sake-of-making-things-better-be-it-2020-and-us/

WHY IS GOOD ISNT IT CHICAGO - I EN THERE IS A LIMIT TO WHY AS FEYNMAN EXPLAINED BUT U KNOW ANALSYIS MEANS WHY - REASONS ENTAILS ASKING WHY - OF COUSRE AFTER A LEVEL

https://westhavendrivepropertymanagement.wordpress.com/2019/11/16/someone-just-viewed-from-olga-and-ajay-a-message-for-all-aspirants-for-any-meaning-and-desire-to-change-not-for-the-sake-of-changing-but-for-the-sake-of-making-things-better-be-it-2020-and-us/

WHY IS GOOD ISNT IT CHICAGO – I EN THERE IS A LIMIT TO WHY AS FEYNMAN EXPLAINED BUT U KNOW ANALSYIS MEANS WHY – REASONS ENTAILS ASKING WHY – OF COUSRE AFTER A LEVEL

YES WHEN U GET DEEPER, IT WOULD GET IRING BUT FOR SOME PEOPLE, ITS GETS INETERSTING WHEN U START SEEING CAUSES OR PATTERES – THAT MAY INDOCATE OR CAUSE REASONS TO EXPLORE AND NVEST IN CUAUSES

UKNOW –   SHALLOW REASONING – AND STATUS QUOU – AND  QUICK  STATISTCIS BASED ANSWERS BY NATE SILVER – ARE WELL STATSISTCIS, TEY ARE NOT CAUSES – STATISTCIS IS CORELATIONAND STATEMENT OF WHATS GOING ON – WHICH IS ALSO AN ART FORM – RT TO PRSENT AND ANRARET IT AND SICIENCE TO CRUNCH THE NUMBERS

BUT – U HAVE TO IF U WANT TO CLAIM TO   BE – WHAT AT LEAT EVEN IN MBA SCHOOL ADMISSIONS THEY SAY -AS REUIREMENT INTELLETCUAL CURIOSITY – THIS S WHEN MBA ISNT THAT IETLLECTUAL TO BEGIN WITH :) BUT TS MORE THAN LIBERASL ARTS FOR SURE

U KNWO  CICAGO, JUST FROM KY SOUL..  LOVE ARTS VEYR VERYMUCH

 MYMOM HAS A DOUBLE DIPLOMA IN MSUC, SHE USED TO PALY MANY INSTRUMENTS, ADD WAS VEYR STRICT AND MORE UTALITARIAN, SO SHE GAVE UP HER HARMONIUM AND GUITAR, AND I WASNT A GREAT ACTOR LIKE  SAY  BARACK WOLD BE IF HE GOT A GIG – BUT I WANST ABAD ACTOR AND I CAN SING TOO – I WAS AT IIT – MOSTLY NOT IN GOING TO CALSSES, BUT WATCHNG SPEILBERG AND HOLLYWOOD  I WATCHED LAMOST ALL MOVIES – WORTH BEING ADE FORM LIKE 1920 IN HOLLY AND BOLYWOOD AND FRANCE AND UK AND GERMANY AND RUSSIA, TILL DATE, OR WELL TILL AT LEATS 2004 – AFTER THAT I MET MISS KAFKA, WHAT COULD POSSIBLY BE A BIGEGR MOVIE THAN OLGA ?

CAN U NAME ONE ?

TRY NAMING ONE MOVIE THATS BEING RUNNING SINCE AT LEATS 2004 – IF NOT 20003 THAT MAKES IT 16 PLUE SYEARS AND EVERY DAY EVERY WORD I SAY IN BAD IDCTION AND GARMEMR, GETS ANALYZED  WHY?

WHY?

WHY ?

U KNOW – FOR YOUR OWN GOOD, FORTHE GOOD OF THE WORLD.. AND I SOMETIMES CARE ABOUT THE GOOD OF NATIONS. BUT NATIONS, NOT A NATION PLEASE .. NOT POSSIBLE BY ME I WANT TO BE TARITOR IN AND FOR ALL NATIONS

ANYWWYA I DIGRESS AS USUAL

SO,  WHEN I WAS INTO THEATER AND DRAMATCIS, I GOT MANY PLAYS, I DID ACT IN I GOT AN AWARDM AT IT – S BEST ACTOR AWARD –  WHICH WAS GIVEN BY SOMEONE WHO CAME FROM BOLYWOOD, BUT IS AVANT GARDE IN BOLLYWOOD BUNOT MASAALA SHIT OF KAHNS OR EVEN MANY ABCHCAN MOVES ARE MSASAL SHIT PREDICATBBLE SAME OLD SHIT – BUT BACHCHAN IS A GOOD ACTOR – THE SENIOR ONE IS

SO, I GOT INOT PAINTING ALSO I STUDIED MODERN ART I HAVE A DEEP LOVE FR ARTS – VEYR DEEP.. MORE THAN I CAN EXPLAIN LIKE PAINTING AND  STYFF

AND I WAS AT IIT – ITS THE MECCA OF TEHCNOLOGY AT LEATS IN INDIA IF NOT THE WORLD, I MEAN WHERE FEYNMANA ND EISNTEIN ARE BIGER THAN GANDHI COULD BE

AND I TOOK COURSES IN SOCIOLOGY

HERE ARE THE 7 ELECTIVES I TOOK AND IN THSOE DAYS THE RIGOR WAS MORE AND THEY WRE BECESSARY – EMANS U HCNAT GET DEGREE IN ENGINEERING UNLESS U TOOK AT LEATS 7 COUSRES OFFIERED BY HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES – DEPARTMEHT

NOTE THEDEPARTMENT IS CALELD UMANITIES ANS CSOCIAL SCIENCES NOT LIBERAL ARTS DEPARTMENT :)

ANYWAY, I HAD DEEP INTESRET IN SCECES BUT MECHANICAL ENGINEERING I LOST INTESRET IN, WHICH REFLECT IN MY GARDES – ALSO BUT ANWYA, MY GADES IN HSS, CALEL HUMANITIES AND SCIL SCINES WERE GOOD

I TOOK THE FOLLOWING COURSE OUT OF CHOICE

[1] PYCHOLOGY

[2] PHILOSOPHY

[3] MODERN ART AN HSITRY OF ARTS AND PAINTING SPECIALLY

[4] ECONOICS – THIS WAS AT ENGINERING SCHOOL PCALED SOCIAL SXINECE :) I EMANS ITS NOT SCIENCE :)

[5[ LIETARTURE, IT WASNT ENGLISH LITEARYURE BUT THAT OF THW WROLD

[6] ADCANCED PSYCHOLOGY

[7] HIISTORY AND SOMETHING

NOW, I AM NOT ARTUCLATE AS U KNOW –  I GO ON TANGETS –

BUT – THE POINT IS THAT – ANY TIEMS WHEN U GUYS HIRE POLITICAL HACKS, THEY MAY HAVE DEOTH IN THEIR SUBJECT LIKE FOR EXAMPLE

WELL FOR EXAMPLE I  KNOW  AMERICAN HISTRY AND WHO WON WHICH COUNTRY BUT I CANT SOLVE – AN INDIDIAN STARRD 12 TH GARDE MATHS OR PYSHICS PORBLME

FOR EXAMPLE –  OF COUSRE I KNOW OBAMA RAIN BOW COLATION AND WE ARENT RED STATES OR BLUE STATE BUT NITED STATES AND YES WE CAN MEANS YES THEY MENAS THAM NOT WHITE CN – AND CCOUSRE I KNOW  MLK AND GANDHI, BUT – SORRY I SAID I KNOW GANDHI BUT THIS VASIHAV JAN TO IS IN HINDI AND SORRY I DOT KNOW WHO IS PATEL SORRY I KNOW KNO W  MATHS AND SORRY I I HAVE BEEN IN DETH IN OBAMA FAMILY YEAH I KNOW WORD ANN DUNHAM –  SOMETHING LIKE THAT

I DONT LIKE EXAMPELS, I AM A BIT FUNADEMHATL LIKE ITANS IN THEIR DNA ARE

BUT ITS LIKE – YEAH I KNOW FROEIGN POLICY – I SPENT 20 YEARS IN  FORIGN SERVICES I AM CHOSEN BY – HILALRY RODHMAN CLINTON – -OK –   THEN – NAME THE DIFFERENT VERSON SOF ISMAIC TRIBES AND TELL ME HOW MANY GODS IN HINDU AND DONT TELL ME FUKUYAMAA ND SHUNDINGTRON AND MERSHEMEIR, BECAUSE EVEN MABS KNOW THAT KUCH – OR OK THEN –  U KNWO FOREIGN, OK WHAT OS THE NAME OF PUTIN’S NECE ::) OR OK U KNOW FORIEGN, ANEM THE INDIN MAFIA OR POLICE OR ? – WHO FUCKE DHOWM :) AND WHEN :)

OR ?

OK U KNOW FORIEGNN – OK – PREEIT THEN WHAT WILL NETANYAHU DO TOMORROW IN LUCNH

THE POINT IS – THAT, MANY TIMES THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE, BUT SIMPLICITY REQIRED A OT OF DEOH AND BREADTH AND THEN NWPWRING DOWN TO THE CORE – AND THE REST AS THEYS AY IN IIT IS ALBEGRA

 U KNOW WHEN U APPLY THE KNWOLEDGE OF MANY  SOMETIMESINTERSETING SOMETIES ORTHHOGNAL DSICIPLINES THEN U WOULD GET DEEPER INTO THE WHY OF THE WHY OF THE WHY

THEN ONLY U CAN KNOW WHY

SO START WITH WHY

ALSO, UNLESS U KNOW THE CAUSE OR THE CAUSES, AS USUAL ITSPLUAR  – U CANT CURE – ITS A HARD TO PROVE STATEMENT, BUT ASK ANY DOCTOR WHY – VIRUS CAT BE CURED, THEY WILL TEL U THAT BECAUSE WE DONT FULLY UNDERSTND WHAT CAUSES – THE VIUS, OR IN OTHER WORDS, WHY VRIUS MUTATES THE WAY IT DOES

ANYWAY, SORRY FOR Y UNORGANZXED TJUGTS BUT UTS RELLY APST 4 AM AND I WAS  TWISTINGA ND TURNING IN MY BED, TRYING TO SLEEP BUT THEN CHICAGO CLCIKED AND I CANT IGNORE U – MY MAN FROM CHICAGO

ANYWAY

SO, SE THIS AND START HERE – HERE IS A GOOD START WASK WHY ?

DONT JUST SAY YEAH BUT THIS SELLS :)

IS BUBBA THERE -> BUBBA -> SO IF THIS IS WHO WE ARE – AND HOW SUASAGE IS AMDE, THEN EITHER WE CHANGE OUR STATES, OR STOP PRECHING – WELL THIS IS WHO WE ARE : AINT THAT  MAKES SENSE TO U BBUBBA ?

image.png

ALSO ONE THING I CAN TELL U – DID U ALL EMANS ALL LEARN WHAT ONE MAN’S LOVE FOR A GIRL AND 6 PEOPLE CAN DO ?? IN MY ACSE DONT FOLLOW THE MONEY, BEASUE MY MONEY IS ALMOST DRIED UP AND IT TOOOK MILLIONS – OF US DOLALRS – SOEMTIEMS – SOME PEOPLE – ATCUALLY TRUELY MEAN WHAT THEY SAY AND THEY SAY WHAT THEY EMAN – AND THEY DO NOT CARE THE COST OF THEIR WORDS OR TTEMENT ON THEIR LIVES – LET ALONE ON ?

SO IN THE MIDDLEON TOP THERE IS A OTRANGE – SEXY – LABEL AND – SEE AGAIN

RGHT BELOW IS 6 BY THE WAY

image.png

SORRY IF U CLICK MROE TIMES THAN I CAN EXPLAND, BUT ITS LIKE WRITING VOLUMES – WHICH ACTUALLY SWEAR TO GOD, IF U CAN MEANS HAVE ABILITY TO TRUST ME SOETIEMS –  MORE WORDS, ISF THEY ARE JUST TO ANRRATE DONT EXPAND BUT TURE PEPE UP –

AGAIN

image.png

THINK ABOUT IT – FOR A MOMENT – JUST THINK AND CLOSE YOUR EYS AND THINKA ND BTW WALSO THINK WHATS IN IT FOR AJAY MAADCCRHOD GANDHI, MOTHERFUCKER, FROM 3RD WORD, OK I CLIEKD, WHY DO U TYPE SO KUCH – SHUT UP AND JST HIT THE SACK.. U CAN THINK WHY I SAID WHAT I SAID – IN SO MANY WORDS, I UDULLY DONT LIKE MANY WORDS

image.png

https://www.google.com/search?q=FROM+OLGA+AND+AJAY+-+A+MESSAGE+:+FOR+ALL+ASPIRANTS+FOR+ANY+MEANING+-+AND+DESIRE+TO+CHANGE+NOT+FOR+THE+SAKE+OF+CHANGING+BUT+FOR+THE+SAKE+OF+MAKING+THINGS+BETTER+-+BE+IT+2020+AND+USA+ELECTIONS+OF+PUTIN+OR+NETANYAHU+OR+YAIR+LAPID+OR+EMANUEL+MACRON+OR+MODI+:+LETS+SATRT+WITH+WHY+WE+SCREWED+UP&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwju1KKL5u_lAhWHM48KHaG-A5AQ_AUoAXoECB8QAw&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25#imgrc=_

https://www.google.com/search?q=FROM+OLGA+AND+AJAY+-+A+MESSAGE+:+FOR+ALL+ASPIRANTS+FOR+ANY+MEANING+-+AND+DESIRE+TO+CHANGE+NOT+FOR+THE+SAKE+OF+CHANGING+BUT+FOR+THE+SAKE+OF+MAKING+THINGS+BETTER+-+BE+IT+2020+AND+USA+ELECTIONS+OF+PUTIN+OR+NETANYAHU+OR+YAIR+LAPID+OR+EMANUEL+MACRON+OR+MODI+:+LETS+SATRT+WITH+WHY+WE+SCREWED+UP&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwju1KKL5u_lAhWHM48KHaG-A5AQ_AUoAXoECB8QAw&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25#imgrc=_

Someone just viewed: NETANYAHU SHALOM BOLLYWOOD WHERE IS OLGA SHULMAN AND SANJAY DUTT MOVIE

BELOW LINK IS A BLOCKS, BOLLYWOOD AND BOMBAST BUSTER MOVIE JUST CLICK THE LINK BELOW IT WOUD TAKE TIM E TO DIGEST EAST WEST MIDDELE EAST AN AFRICA AND RUSSIAN VESTS

https://www.google.com/search?q=NETANYAHU+SHALOM+BOLLYWOOD+WHERE+IS+OLGA+SHULMAN+AND+SANJAY+DUTT+MOVIE&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiS5vuw4u_lAhULqI8KHcVyCvUQ_AUoAnoECB0QBA&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25#imgrc=_

From: Streak
Date: Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 3:47 AM
Subject: Someone just viewed: NETANYAHU SHALOM BOLLYWOOD WHERE IS OLGA SHULMAN AND SANJAY DUTT MOVIE
To:

5c06a15b95c700eebb7b9823_headerLockup_2x.png

Someone just viewed: “NETANYAHU SHALOM BOLLYWOOD WHERE IS OLGA SHULMAN AND SANJAY DUTT MOVIE”

People on thread: Yoni Netanyahu Olga Blog Post By Email
Device: Android Tablet
Location: Unknown

© 2011-2019 Streak
160 Pine Street, San Francisco, CA 94111

eyJlbWFpbF9pZCI6IlJNX3lBUUVBQVc1MlNyampHdXlWbnlLTnpXejRGUT09In0=

Someone just viewed: OLGA WHARS ALL THIESE? WHARS WITH GANDHI VERSUS OBAMA ? IS GANDHI COOL? I CAN BE FARWENDS HSEEP WITH GANDHI IF WONTS TO FIGHT WITH BARACK OBAMA AND BB NETANYAHOOO – WILLIAME CLINTON – SE THISE – IS THIS FULLISHE OR SILLEY OR COOL ? IS THIESE SUNDAR PICAHI AJAY’S NOR COOL AFRAIENDS – TELL ME BASCEU KIKA IS HEAD OF INTERENST NOR ANYNE LESE REGARSD HOTMAN

FARIENDS SEE THIESE

GANDHI VERSUS OBAMA

https://www.google.com/search?q=OLGA+WHARS+ALL+THIESE%3F+WHARS+WITH+GANDHI+VERSUS+OBAMA+%3F+IS+GANDHI+COOL%3F+I+CAN+BE+FARWENDS+HSEEP+WITH+GANDHI+IF+WONTS+TO+FIGHT+WITH+BARACK+OBAMA+AND+BB+NETANYAHOOO+-+WILLIAME+CLINTON+-+SE+THISE+-+IS+THIS+FULLISHE+OR+SILLEY+OR+COOL+%3F+IS+THIESE+SUNDAR+PICAHI+AJAY%27S+NOR+COOL+AFRAIENDS+-+TELL+ME+BASCEU+KIKA+IS+HEAD+OF+INTERENST+NOR+ANYNE+LESE+REGARSD+HOTMAN&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiq97G73-_lAhVEWysKHWruCRMQ_AUoAnoECAYQBA&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25

Someone just viewed: OLGA SHULMAN LEDNICHENKO BIBI OR TIBI OR TV

HELLO CHICAGO,

I WAS ABOUT TO CLOSE SHOP, BUT THEN I SAW A RED ALERT , THAT SAYS BIG SHOT FROM CHICAGO IN GMAIL LABEL

CHICAGO

AND I CANT IGNORE U

SO

BTW THIS IS COOL

I CANT TAKE SCREEN SHOT OF EVERY PAGE EVEN WHEN I LIKE PHOTOS

LINK BELOW IS QUITE SEXY

https://www.google.com/search?q=:+%22OLGA+SHULMAN+LEDNICHENKO+BIBI+OR+TIBI+OR+TV%22&pws=0&gl=us&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRobab2e_lAhWZXSsKHV3XBC0Q_AUoAXoECAQQAw&biw=1536&bih=754&dpr=1.25#imgrc=_

From: Streak
Date: Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 2:56 AM
Subject: Someone just viewed: OLGA SHULMAN LEDNICHENKO BIBI OR TIBI OR TV
To:

5c06a15b95c700eebb7b9823_headerLockup_2x.png

Someone just viewed: “OLGA SHULMAN LEDNICHENKO BIBI OR TIBI OR TV”

People on thread: Yoni Netanyahu Olga Blog Post By Email
Device: PC
Location: Chicago, IL

© 2011-2019 Streak
160 Pine Street, San Francisco, CA 94111

eyJlbWFpbF9pZCI6IlJNX3lBUUVBQVc1MkhFc2JPb0FaLXQ0TUJ3eUJUdz09In0=